IF there's a general consensus that the law is overreaching and silly
AND we do decide to follow the letter of the law and remove content anyway
THEN I propose we set a date for the removal of content, and publish a
press release about why we're removing the content and how we feel
about silly laws, so at least the issue gets some media attention, and
the wider public can gain a better appreciation for the ethos of
Wikimedia and free/open content.
Does anyone disagree, and think the ban on photography in reserves is
a positive or neutral thing?