Sharing from the Foundation-l mailing list.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Denny Vrandečić <denny.vrandecic(a)wikimedia.de>
Date: 2012/3/30
Subject: [Foundation-l] Press release about Wikidata
To: Foundation list <foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Hi all,
Wikimedia Germany is sending out a press release about Wikidata today. The
press release sums up the information that has been published on Meta since
last Wikimania, where it was first presented and discussions started, and
refined since then, including information about the donation that is making
Wikidata possible.
<http://www.wikimedia.de/wiki/Pressemitteilungen/PM_3_12_Wikidata_EN>
More information about Wikidata is on its Meta page:
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikidata>
We are very excited about the Wikidata development team starting on Monday.
This also means, that in the future we will be communicating about Wikidata
much more, as the development is finally starting. Yay!
I want to take this opportunity to thank the donors of Wikidata, the Allen
Institute of Artificial Intelligence ai2, the Gordon and Betty Moore
Foundation, and Google for the generous support, that enables us to work on
the Wikidata project for the next year.
Exciting times are waiting for us, Cheers all,
Denny
--
Project director Wikidata
Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. | Eisenacher Straße 2 | 10777 Berlin
Tel. +49-30-219 158 26-0 | http://wikimedia.de
Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V.
Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter
der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für
Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985.
The following translation are now available for the February 2012
"Wikimedia Highlights", which combine some of the most relevant
information from the Wikimedia Foundation Report and the Wikimedia
engineering report for February 2012 with a selection of other
important events from the Wikimedia movement. Help is welcome in
spreading the translated versions among the project communities for
these languages, where this has not already been done. Many thanks to
all translators!
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Highlights,_February_2012/de
Höhepunkte aus dem Bericht der Wikimedia Foundation und dem
technischen Bericht von Wikimedia für Februar 2012, mit einer Auswahl
anderer wichtiger Ereignisse aus der Wikimedia-Bewegung
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Highlights,_February_2012/fr
Éclairages sur le rapport de la Wikimedia Foundation et le rapport
d’ingénierie Wikimedia pour février 2012, avec une sélection d’autres
événements importants du mouvement Wikimedia.
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Highlights,_February_2012/it
Punti salienti dal rapporto della Wikimedia Foundation e dal rapporto
ingegneristico Wikimedia di febbraio 2012, con una selezione di altre
importanti iniziative dagli eventi di Wikimedia
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Highlights,_February_2012/ja
2012年2月のウィキメディア財団報告書及びウィキメディア技報の抄録ほかウィキメディア運動の重要行事について
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Highlights,_February_2012/nl
Hoogtepunten uit de Wikimedia Foundationrapportage en de Wikimedia
technische rapportage voor februari 2012, aangevuld met een selectie
van andere belangrijke gebeurtenissen binnen de Wikimediabeweging.
Suggestions for the movement news section in the upcoming Highlights
issue are welcome until April 4, see
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Highlights .
--
Tilman Bayer
Movement Communications
Wikimedia Foundation
IRC (Freenode): HaeB
Hey folks,
I sent the note below to the staff and board a few hours ago: sharing
now with everyone :-)
Thanks,
Sue
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Sue Gardner <sgardner(a)wikimedia.org>
Date: 20 March 2012 19:17
Subject: Announcement: New editor engagement experiments team!
To: Staff All <wmfall(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Hey folks,
A couple of changes at the Wikimedia Foundation that I want you to know about.
Everybody knows that reversing stagnating/declining participation in
Wikimedia’s projects is our top priority. To make better progress, as
of April 16 we're going to bring together resources from the Community
and Engineering/Product departments into a new cross-functional team
tasked specifically with conducting small, rapid experiments designed
to improve editor retention. We already know some of the fixes that
will solve the editor retention problem, and we're working to put them
in place. The purpose of *this* team will be to identify the fixes we
don't yet know about.
Separately, Zack has to move back to Missouri for family reasons. When
Zack told me about that, we agreed that it’s an extra impetus for this
new team to be launched now. This means that going forward, Zack’s
department will focus solely on fundraising, and some members of his
department will move permanently into other groups. There have been
lots of conversations about this over the past few weeks, which have
included everyone affected.
So here’s what we’re going to do:
FUNDRAISING:
Zack will manage fundraising remotely. He’ll continue to be part of
the C-level team, but he’ll do it from Missouri. He’ll travel back to
San Francisco frequently, and he’ll probably be here throughout the
fundraising campaign every year and spend other longer chunks of time
here when needed.
We don’t yet know what the title of Zack’s department will be, or what
Zack’s title will be. Neither Zack nor I care very much about titles,
and we are in the happy position of not particularly needing to
impress anyone -- so, we do not need fancy euphemistic titles. It
would be nice to have titles that are clear and direct and
understandable, and also to have ones that reflect the
creative/storytelling/community aspect of the fundraising team’s work.
So, we are leaving this piece open for the time being, and we’ll just
call the department “fundraising” until and unless we think of
something better. Folks with suggestions should talk with Zack. :-)
EDITOR ENGAGEMENT EXPERIMENTATION:
Reflecting the importance of editor engagement in the Wikimedia
Foundation’s strategy, we will have the following teams directly
focused on it:
**the Visual Editor group (led by Trevor as lead developer, and by
the soon-to-be hired Technical Product Analyst) which is making the
visual editor;
**the Editor Engagement group (led by Fabrice Florin as Product
Manager and Ian Baker as ScrumMaster) which is working on medium-term
projects improving Wikimedia’s handling of reputation/identity and of
notifications;
**the new team focused on rapid experimentation, led by Karyn as
Product Manager and a to-be-hired engineering lead/ScrumMaster,
tentatively titled something like Research & Experimentation, Editor
Engagement Innovation Lab or the Rapid Experimentation Team.
Our thinking is basically this: we know the Visual Editor will help
with editor retention. We know that improving notifications,
messaging, identity and other core features of MediaWiki will help
with editor retention. But there are a handful of other smaller
projects --maybe just simple tweaks, maybe ideas that should become
fully-fledged new features-- that will also help. The purpose of the
new experimentation team will be to conduct many quick experiments,
which will identify a handful of small changes that can either be
accomplished by the team itself, or be queued up as part of our
overall product backlog.
Staff moving from the Community Dept to Engineering and Product
Development (AKA Tech) are: Karyn Gladstone, Maryana Pinchuk, Steven
Walling, and Ryan Faulkner. They will form a team tasked with rapid
experimentation to find policy, product or other changes that will
increase editor retention. Karyn will head product thinking and
maintain the experimentation backlog, reporting to Howie. Alolita will
hire and manage the engineers for this team, and will help interface
them with the rest of the engineering organization. The important
thing to know about this team is that they are being tasked with one
of our absolutely most important objectives: to figure out new ways to
increase editor engagement and retention.
Karyn will report to Howie. Maryana, Ryan Faulker, and Steven will
report to Karyn. The group has never had engineering resources
assigned to it, and it’s clear they need engineering resources.
Therefore, Alolita will work in close partnership with Karyn to
recruit an engineering team --mostly developers but also UI/design
people-- to support the new group. If you have ideas for people we
should be recruiting for this, please tell Alolita or Karyn!
Dario Taraborelli will join the editor engagement experimentation team
as senior researcher and help design the roadmap and the individual
experiments the team will run.
We don’t yet have a firm title for the experimentation team, nor do we
know yet what Karyn’s title will be, or whether other people’s titles
(like, Steven or Maryana’s) will change. The team will figure this
out, and to that end they’re kicking it around with other staff and
with some folks in the community.
FELLOWSHIPS:
As most of you know, Siko runs our fellowship program. The fellowship
program has lots of similarities to Asaf’s work on the grants program
-- they are both, at heart, about giving funding and other support to
members of the Wikimedia community to enable people to do useful work.
The community-building projects that fellows often take on line up
with some of Global Dev’s work, particularly as the fellowship program
expands its global reach. So as we’ve been talking through Zack’s move
and the implications for the Community department, it makes sense to
shift Siko to Global Development. Siko’s title remains Head of
Community Fellowships for now and she will report to Barry. Fellows
and fellowship projects are continuing as planned, and you are still
highly encouraged to keep an eye peeled for community members with
good fellowship ideas. :)
EDITOR RETENTION OVERALL:
Finally, I want to talk for a minute about editor retention overall.
As you know, we started the year with two major goals: the increase
the number of mobile pageviews to two billion, and to push up the
number of active editors to 95K. We’re doing fine on mobile reach
(yay!) but we are completely failing to move the needle on the number
of active Wikimedia editors.
That doesn’t reflect poorly on the people who work on editor
retention. It’s a complex problem that took a decade to develop, and
the team doesn’t control all the variables affecting it. It makes
sense that it will take time to fix.
But it does mean that we need to increase the resources focused on it,
so we can get more done faster. That’s what we’re doing here. We’re
reorganizing to focus our existing resources more tightly, and we’ll
also be adding new resources -- starting now, and continuing through
the 2012-13 financial planning process. And, we’re going to move
many/most of the editor-retention related people up to the 6th floor
by the collab space. I really love the model Zack developed for the
annual campaign -- the war room in Yongle, work visible on the walls
for everyone, the buzz of people working hard towards a common
purpose. I want us to have that same energy and momentum and focus for
the editor retention work.
Sorry for this long note, but I figure you will all be curious about
this and have questions, so the goal here was to anticipate everything
and get it answered up-front. This note was crafted collectively by
many people :-) If questions remain, please feel free to ask them, or
to talk with any of the individuals involved. And thanks to everyone
who contributed to creating this plan: I very much appreciate
everyone’s single-minded focus on attacking the editor retention
problem, and I look forward to future success moving the needle on it.
Everything I talk about in this mail will take effect April 16. Once
it’s in your in-box, it’s no longer confidential, and you can feel
free to talk about it publicly. I will forward it to announce-l, after
I give you a couple of hours to read it yourselves. And please join me
in congratulating the folks who are going to work on this important
new team :-)
Thanks,
Sue
Q What’s the impetus behind these changes?
A Two things. Mainly, we want to redouble our focus on attacking the
editor retention problem, and it makes sense for us therefore to
consolidate our efforts into a single focused mega-team. Secondarily,
Zack has decided he needs to relocate to Missouri. We had already been
talking about whether consolidation made sense -- with Zack moving,
that accelerated those conversations.
Q What’s happening to Zack?
A Zack will lead our fundraising remotely, as a C-level employee. His
title and the title of his team will change to reflect that, but no
final decisions have been made yet about what those titles will be.
Ideally we’d like to have a title for that department, and for Zack,
that reflects the storytelling aspect of their work, telling the
community’s stories to the world. But in the end we may settle for
just calling it Fundraising, if we don’t think of anything better.
Q What’s happening to the Community Department?
A We initially created a community department because it made sense to
have focused resources dedicated to understanding the community and
being a centre of expertise about it for the Wikimedia Foundation. At
the time that was the right thing to do, because although some
individual staff members had lots of community understanding, the
organization as a whole did not -- which meant it made sense for us to
focus our energy, for a time, on researching and documenting and
analysing the community. But having a Community Department was never a
perfect fit for the Wikimedia Foundation the way it is for other
internet companies, because community is not a small subset or a
single aspect of what we do at the Wikimedia Foundation --- all our
departments have interactions with community members for multiple
different purposes, and over time we have been growing specific
community expertise and responsibilities in multiple departments
throughout the organization. As expertise grew elsewhere, having a
community department became a less-good fit for us. Basically: it made
sense to have a Community Department at the time when we did it, and
it makes less sense now as the organization has matured and evolved.
Q Why are you integrating the Karyn/Ryan/Steven/Maryana group into
Engineering and Product Development?
A The goal is to create a better model for rapid
experimentation/innovation, with minimal hindrance to the work of our
active editors and maximal gain in new community members. That group
is not necessarily a perfect fit with Engineering and Product
Development, but we think that’s okay: it’s a good fit, and being in
that department will enable the team to increase its impact overall,
by giving it better access to UI/design and engineering resources.
Q How is the new product team different from Fabrice’s team?
A The new team won’t focus on critical major changes to the platform
(like the Visual Editor) or critical but equally complex projects like
improving the mechanisms by which editors communicate and collaborate
on the projects. This team will be much more fast-paced and
experimental, identifying small-scale interventions that might make an
impact on editor retention and quickly iterating through them on a
weekly (or even daily) basis. Unlike Fabrice’s team, which has a list
of projects that are known to be important and impactful, this team
will quickly cycle through a large number of ideas that have not yet
been tested in order to identify what does and doesn’t work, and what
can be integrated into existing product roadmaps.
Q Will this new team be building new features?
A No. Ideas for new features that come out of successful experiments
will be handed off to Fabrice’s team or elsewhere in engineering/tech
as is appropriate for the task.
Q What kinds of projects will this new team be working on?
A Some of our projects will be similar to the template A/B testing
conducted by Steven, Maryana, and Ryan Faulkner: small tweaks to
existing community-built systems like template messaging. Others will
focus on more innovative ways to engage new and current editors, using
notifications, task assignment, and different kinds of incentives to
keep editing. All of the projects will be temporary tests, not
permanent large-scale changes, and focus on measuring effects to
inform further decisions.
Q How can volunteers give input on this work?
A Ping Steven or Maryana.
Q Who will be in charge of this work?
A The C-level in charge of this team is Erik Moeller. The team reports
to Karyn Gladstone.
Q Where will fellowships live and how do fellows fit with other teams?
A The fellowships program will move to Global Development, but the
structure and scope of current and planned fellowships will not
change. Fellows will continue to be recruited from the community to
work on their own projects, supported by Siko Bouterse, Head of the
Fellowships Program.
Q Where will other community projects live (e.g., summer
researchers/analytics, community convenings)?
A Current community department projects will be integrated into either
the new team or other teams in the organization, depending on their
purpose. Convenings of various kinds will be staged on an ad hoc basis
by multiple groups, including this one.
Q What’s happening to fundraising and storytelling?
A The fundraising team, which includes storytelling, will be managed
by Zack and will continue to operate as planned.
Q Why is this all so confusing? The Wikimedia Foundation changes
people’s titles and reporting lines all the time!
A Yes, we do :-) The Wikimedia Foundation is a pretty young
organization: it’s growing, and doing lots of experimentation. We
learn new things all the time, and we want to be able to apply what
we’re learning, which includes restructuring/reinventing ourselves. If
we were a hundred-year-old organization, or if we had tens of
thousands of employees, it would be hard for us to adapt and change,
because there would be too many layers of people who would need to be
involved, and the downstream implications of even small changes would
be serious. That’s a problem for big/old organizations, because it
limits their adaptability. Luckily, at this point the Wikimedia
Foundation is still small enough and young enough that we can afford
to be reasonably flexible. That said, we know that this kind of change
can be confusing for people who aren’t involved (at a minimum, it’s
one more long e-mail to read), so we appreciate everybody’s patience
:-)
Q How can I join this team?
A We’re hiring! We’re looking for more experienced editors to help us
design experiments, track results, and communicate what we’re doing.
We are also looking for strong front-and back-end developers to deploy
experiments. If you’re interested in working with us, please check out
available positions on the Wikimedia Foundation jobs page:
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Job_openings
--
Sue Gardner
Executive Director
Wikimedia Foundation
415 839 6885 office
415 816 9967 cell
Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in
the sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality!
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate
All,
We’re happy to announce our fourth employee at the UK chapter – Stevie
Benton. Stevie will be taking on the communications role for the
charity. He has worked in non-profit communications for over eight years
in a variety of disciplines, including internal communications, press,
online and multimedia. He believes that education and access to
information are fundamental to the development of humanity.
He’ll be working from the office in Old Street, but believes in being
very hands-on and is looking forward to getting out and meeting as many
Wikimedians, volunteers and partners as possible. Stevie is interested
in all kinds of art, literature and music, enjoys video games and is a
long-suffering fan of the Philadelphia Eagles NFL team.
Over the next few weeks Stevie will be working with Wikipedians to
promote the Monmouthpedia Project in April and our AGM in the Science
Museum in early May. He can be contacted at at
stevie.benton(a)wikimedia.org.uk, or by phone on 0207 065 0993.
Richard Symonds
Office& Development Manager
Wikimedia UK
+44 (0) 207 065 0992
--
Wikimedia UK is the operating name of Wiki UK Limited, a Charitable Company
Registered in England and Wales, No: 6741827. Charity No:1144513 Office: 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street,
London EC2A 4LT.
Wikimedia UK is the local chapter of the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate
Wikipedia, amongst other projects). It is an independent non-profit
organization with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for
its contents.
Dear all,
Please find the February 2012 report of Wikimedia Hungary available at:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_chapters/Reports/Wikim%C3%A9dia_Ma….
Reports covering the September-November 2011 period have also been
published in Hungarian at:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_chapters/Reports/Wikim%C3%A9dia_Ma….
We hope to use the Translate extension so that over time our Hungarian
reports can be read in English and our English reports in Hungarian. In the
mean time, we are happy to answer any questions.
For your convenience, the February report is copied below.
Best regards,
Bence Damokos
Wikimedia Hungary
'''Wikimedia Hungary Report'''
'''Vol 5 Issue 2'''
'''February 2012'''
''Prepared by: Bence Damokos''
This is an update on Wikimedia Hungary's activities covering the February
2012 period. We have recently uploaded to Meta our reports for the
September-November 2011 period in Hungarian, you can find them
[[Wikimedia_chapters/Reports/Wikimédia_Magyarország|here]].
==Activities ==
* We have awarded one small grant to buy a book to help improve articles on
[[:en:Franz Liszt|Franz Liszt]]. Furthermore, we have created info pages
about our programs to provide funding for community projects[1] and
travel[2].
* Work has been ongoing on replenishing our stock of Wikipedia themed
merchandise. Tangible results are expected by end of March, early April.
* We held two smaller scale meetups for our members, at one of them Milos
Rancic from Wikimedia Serbia was also present.
* Furthermore, a full-day board meeting was held with the main topic being
the implementation of our annual plan.[3]
* Orsolya, one of our members has participated in the Open Wiki GLAM of
Serbia event in Belgrade.[4]
* Bence, our vice-president participated in the Paris finance summit.[5]
* Bence (later joined by Ting Chen, Chair of the Wikimedia Foundation) has
spent a weekend as a guest of Slovene Wikipedians as they were celebrating
the tenth anniversary of the Slovene Wikipedia.[6] The anniversary has
garnered substantial media attention. On the visit, Bence has discussed the
idea of a Slovene Wikipedia chapter and the general process and
requirements of establishing a local Wikimedia organisation.
* Our office manager has participated in a conference and training about
the new laws and regulations governing Hungarian civil society, and has
prepared a summary of the regulatory context.[7]
* Our website was restored following a crash in January[8]
* We have started preparing a campaign to collect 1% income tax allocations
from Hungarian donors. A specialized fundraising agreement with the
Wikimedia Foundation was agreed to and (as of March 2012) signed.
* Csongor Gál has joined our ranks as a communications intern until about
April.
== Financials ==
The following financial data is provided for informational purposes only.
The data presented is not audited and may change slightly as all invoices
come in. Amounts are in Hungarian Forints.
=== Expenses ===
[[File:Wikimedia Hungary expenses in 2012.png|right|thumb|Expenses by month
of Wikimedia Hungary in 2012]]
{|
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Category'''
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''January'''
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''February'''
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Total YTD'''
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Plan 2012'''
|-
| postage fees|| 18 286 || 2 315 || 20 601 || 30 000
|-
| server maintenance|| 34 375 || 34 375 || 68 750 || 420 000
|-
| employee and employment costs|| 17 705 || 235 038 || 252 743 ||
2 500 000
|-
| office space|| 13 875 || 9 398 || 23 273 || 60 000
|-
| telephone|| 11 553 || 5 135 || 16 688 || 100 000
|-
| printer and printing costs|| 33 610 || - || 33 610 || 70 000
|-
| debt to Wikimedia Austria|| 61 100 || - || 61 100 || 50 000
|-
| banking fees|| 7 165 || 3 850 || 11 015 || 50 000
|-
| community travel|| 4 320 || - || 4 320 || 1 725 000
|-
| board travel|| - || 119 200 || 119 200 || 650 000
|-
| board meeting|| - || 46 818 || 46 818 || 100 000
|-
| small grants programme|| - || 3 200 || 3 200 || 100 000
|-
| accountant|| 13 208 || - || 13 208 || 300 000
|-
| '''Total:'''|| '''215 197''' || '''459 329''' || '''674 526''' ||
|}
=== Revenues===
[[File:Wikimedia_Hungary_income_in_2012.png|right|thumb|Revenues by month
of Wikimedia Hungary in 2012]]
{|
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Category'''
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''January'''
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''February'''
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Total YTD'''
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Plan 2012'''
|-
| donations|| 9 500 || 113 000 || 122 500 || -
|-
| interest|| 39 705 || 36 406 || 76 111 || -
|-
| membership fees|| 19 000 || 6 000 || 25 000 || 100 000
|-
| other|| - || 23 985 || 23 985 || -
|-
| '''Total:'''||'''68 205'''||'''179 391'''||'''247 596'''||
|}
==Links==
* [1]:
http://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:Wikim%C3%A9dia_Magyarorsz%C3%A1…
* [2]:
http://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:Wikim%C3%A9dia_Magyarorsz%C3%A1…
* [3]: http://wikimedia.hu/wiki/2012-es_programterv/en
* [4]: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Open_Wiki_GLAM_of_Serbia
* [5]: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Finance_meeting_2012
* [6]: http://sl.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:10
* [7]:
http://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Szerkeszt%C5%91:Samat_(WMM)/Civil_szervezetek_…
(in Hungarian)
*[8]:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_chapters/Reports/Wikim%C3%A9dia_Ma…
* Blog posts published in February:
http://huwiki.blogspot.com/2012_02_01_archive.html
This is the chapter report for Wikimedia Nederland for January 2012.
== Cultural heritage ==
Together with Teylers Museum in Haarlem there is a "challenge" in
which people are asked to write Wikipedia articles about subjects
related to that museum.
Conferences etc.
On Saturday January, 21st WMNL was the guest of Teylers Museum in
Haarlem. Our new years reception (nieuwjaarsborrel) was visited by ca.
120-150 people.
== Press and outreach ==
The anti SOPA strike was a news subject in the Netherlands on and
around January 18th. Many newspapers reported, and our president was
on national TV for the issue.
== Upcoming ==
February: strategy weekend board
March: general assembly
This is the chapter report for Wikimedia Nederland for February 2012.
== Cultural heritage ==
User:Husky gave a short one-day course on editing in Wikipedia to
volunteers in Gouda, co-organized by Goudanet and The Gouda platform
for History. People made their first edits and wrote their first
article on Gouda history. Around 10 people participated including
people from the local library. The volunteers will continue to edit
Wikipedia in the next few months.
Conferences etc.
== Other ==
The board of WMNL met in Zutphen on the 4th and 5th for a strategy
weekend. The results should be presented to the members before the
general assembly on March 24th, so they will have time to give
feedback on the results.
On the 25th the WMNL board had an afternoon scheduled on the day of a
Wiki-Saturday to receive people who are interested in a board
position.
== Upcoming ==
March: general assembly
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_chapters/Reports/Wikimedia_Nederla…
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
Vereniging Wikimedia Nederland
dr. Ziko van Dijk, voorzitter
http://wmnederland.nl/
-----------------------------------------------------------
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
