Dorothy says: "
I also want to stress that Wikimedia NYC should not be a place for unwanted, unprofessional romantic attention. This kind of attention makes it hard to feel like a real person when one's intellectual interests are being interrupted by an objectifying gaze. I ask that the group treat our events and meetings like a workplace in the sense that harassment of a sexual or romantic nature should not be tolerated. "
I just want to add support to this. This is largely why I stopped attending WMNYC events a year or so ago; after I spent a few events having my body stared at, I simply couldn't dredge up enough interest in future events to outweigh the intensely creepy experience I'd had.
As far as teaching attitudes that have been offputting, Dorothy, could you possibly go into more detail about that? Since I haven't been at recent events, it's hard for me to picture what type of situations you've been experiencing these problems in. I don't mean that in an "account for what you say!" sense, but just a "huh, I'm curious about what's been experienced and how it can be changed" sense (if you'd rather have that type of conversation off-list, please feel free to email me directly at this address).
My personal feeling - and again, since I've avoided events for a while now, this may be outdated - is that WMNYC events focus(ed) too heavily on cross-pollinating with FOSS groups rather than on bringing in active wikimedians, and as a result most WMNYC events have/had a largely male, largely technical, largely non-wikimedian attendee list. These people are of course welcome at our events, but what used to be a friendly, social, not-especially-technical meetup group has become very much a male-techie-experience group.
-Fluffernutter