其次，我個人的感覺是，基金會所認知的 active or inactive，除了常發言外，更重要的是否有 concrete objectives and action items，畢竟，如果是以協會的方式運作，和單純社群的內容累積，應該是要有所差異的。

這樣的目標或行動方案，或許是在推動公部門對 Wikimedia 或是 open content 的認知（甚而推動政策性的改變），或許是實際引起其他組織對此議題的興趣。橫向的連結資源，簡言之，除了經營既有社群，更重要的是，發掘新的社群基礎。

也讓 Jeromy 與 TIng 知道，六月的理監事討論，也希望能納入新的社群人力進來，這點請鐘銘補充。

我個人是希望可以邀請 Creative Commons Taiwan 的 Bob Chao 參與。（不知道虎兒是否能以理事長的身分，邀請 Bob 參加我們的討論）

以上一些想到的補充，再次謝謝 Jeromy 的建議！

自強

2010/4/18 Jeromy-Yu Maximilian Chan <yuyu@wikimedia.hk>

I just heard from Morgan,
even though we, Hong Kong chapter speak a lot,
some board member do think us inactive either
(thanks for Ting telling Morgan, and we think we need to improve this)

I truly believe you guys had did as much as you can in your current post and daily jobs
and probably lack of communication with the Foundation

but I do think you need to back to laymen, to consider how to motivate the community to volunteer for the chapter

I do see some possibility like Alex & 小b may be able to help around (purely personal thought)

2010/4/18 Tzu-Chiang Liou <tcliou@gmail.com>

--
Tzu-Chiang Liou
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/tcliou
FaceBook: http://www.facebook.com/tcliou
Email: tcliou@ {gmail.com|iis.sinica.edu.tw}