no worries Mossab! Perfectly understood :)

(BTW was the meeting held? Are there any notes posted about the conclusions?)

Virus-free. www.avast.com

‪On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 6:06 PM ‫مفتاح المعرفة‬‎ <mossab748@gmail.com> wrote:‬

Dear colleagues. Sorry for this email at that time. I have agreed to publish this email on our mailing list but because I was not connected to Internet it was not transmitted through (wikijournal email is not registered in our mailing list so that it need acceptance for every single email). Today i connected to Internet so that it reached late. Apologize. 

Mossab Banat
Wikipedia Admin

في السبت، ٢٩ فبراير، ٢٠٢٠ ٣:١٦ م Stuart Ray <soupvector@gmail.com> كتب:

Agree! Odd.

On Sat, Feb 29, 2020, 6:34 AM Mina Theofilatou <saintfevrier@gmail.com> wrote:

why did I just get this email? Today is the 29th of Feb!

Virus-free. www.avast.com

On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 1:23 PM WikiJournal of Science contact <contact@wikijsci.org> wrote:

Hello,

Just a reminder that this meeting is coming up tomorrow (don't forget to check your local time).

• 8pm UTC 27th of Feb
• Jitsi attendance link
• Meeting plan and agenda 

Hope to see you there!  

 

On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 5:23 PM WikiJournal of Science contact <contact@wikijsci.org> wrote:

Hello everyone,

Please join us for an open webinar on the present and future of the WikiJournal User Group and its projects!

8pm UTC 27th of Feb
Jitsi attendance link
Meeting plan and agenda

• 20 mins - Presentation, summary & update of the current project status
• 40 minutes - Discussion, questions, ideas & feedback open to all participants

We look forward to seeing you there!

Background:

The WikiJournal User Group runs a set of peer reviewed academic journals that have the unique feature of being highly Wikipedia integrated. Papers can include links to Wikipedia pages, figures are all uploaded to Commons, and suitable material (or even whole articles) can be copied over to Wikipedia. In fact, Wikipedia pages have even been submitted to the journals for peer review.

 

The concept is to couple the rigour of academic peer review with the extreme reach of the wiki ecosystem. This improves the accuracy of the encyclopedia and its sister projects, and rewards authors with citable, indexed publications. Authors are treated the same whether they are professors or students, with a focus on the article’s accuracy and referencing.

Peer reviews are public (example) and 75% of reviewers agree to have their identities open.

Article formats are flexible and have included:

• Broad review article that also becomes a Wikipedia page (example) 
• Existing Wikipedia page submitted for peer review (example) 
• Focused review articles that have images or text added to Wikipedia pages (example)
• Technical reviews that can accompany a Wikipedia page (example)
• Stand-alone research articles (example)

Can't get enough?

Follow us at twitter on @WikiJMed | @WikiJSci | @WikiJHum

See out application to the WMF to found a sister project site

Join the WikiJournals general mailing list

Read this piece in the Signpost

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-Medicine mailing list
Wikimedia-Medicine@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-medicine

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-Medicine mailing list
Wikimedia-Medicine@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-medicine

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-Medicine mailing list
Wikimedia-Medicine@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-medicine

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-Medicine mailing list
Wikimedia-Medicine@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-medicine

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-Medicine mailing list
Wikimedia-Medicine@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-medicine