In a message dated 10/24/2010 5:15:14 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
wiki-list(a)phizz.demon.co.uk writes:
Perhaps you aren't listening? Although I do notice
moments where you
tend to make the same points. Still what I'm trying to do is to at least
get some here to think as to how one might produce a body of work that
can be relied upon. Where the body of work isn't continually under
attack or being buggered about with. >>
Perhaps it's you were aren't listening. Because we already know how "one
might produce a body of work *upon which* one can rely".
That's not the problem however with your "suggestions".
Rather, you want to *change* Wikipedia into that sort of work. Or rather I
think actually you'd have wished it had been that way from the get-go.
But it wasn't, it's not, and it's not really likely that this sort of
approach is one in which you'll find a result that you would wish.
Doesn't it seem to you like this sort of method, is not likely to work?
I mean, posting your grievances here on Foundation-L ?
W