This problem with the adress wikilegal-l being
inserted in some messages has been going on for a
It is a problem with gname, and I have no idea how to
I just know that it makes all those prefixed messages
refused by the mailing list system.
I suggested that those still posting to wikilegal-l
remove the adress from their mails, and only post to
foundation-l, so that it does not break the gname
system. But ... :-(
Would anyone caring for mailing list has an idea how
to fix this problem ?
my answer to Michael is at the end of this message :-)
--- Mail Delivery System
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 06:11:37 +0000 (UTC)
From: MAILER-DAEMON(a)mail.wikimedia.org (Mail
Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
This is the Postfix program at host
I'm sorry to have to inform you that the message
below could not be delivered to one or more
For further assistance, please send mail to
If you do so, please include this problem report.
delete your own text from the message returned
The Postfix program
<wikilegal-l(a)wikimedia.org>rg>: unknown user:
ATTACHMENT part 3 message/rfc822
From: Anthere <anthere9(a)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Re: NEH grant
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 08:13:05 +0200
Michael Snow wrote:
> Christopher Mahan wrote:
>> I too wish to express my misgivings at getting
the grant. There's
>> always strings attached, and targets have
met, and so on. Who's
>> gonna run it? Who's gonna keep track
money, the milestones,
>> I would rather mav publish a monthly budget and
post that to the
>> front page, like this:
>> This month, we need $4000 to meet expenses. So
far, users have
>> contributed $2800. Thank you!
>> If budget is met, then you write:
>> This month's budget has been met. Thank you!
>> It needs to be updated daily.
> I strongly disagree with this.
> A budget is not something you balance week per
week or even month per
> month. We must plan it. In advance. A budget
something you have to
> organise, to take into account structural
to best use the remaining.
With respect to budgets, and also with respect to
management involved in running a grant, Anthere
quite right. The
people who have to do the actual work cannot get
the job done if they
have to spend half or more of their time keeping
updated on what they're doing.
However, it would be nice to see more frequent
updates just about
fundraising progress, which is what this
suggestion focuses on.
This is planned to be on the new fundation website,
as part of the
feedback the organisation can provide donors.
For more information about the new website content,
Please add to the page :-)
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!