I agree completely with this, there is no point potentially humiliating a
bid team by revealing that they got very low scores, for example.
Perhaps a way forward would be that the scoring matrix for each bid team
would be sent privately to that team (perhaps with some anonymisation of
members of the jury), and it would be up to each bid team whether they
wanted to make their numbers public.
Cheers,
Craig
On 23 April 2014 03:02, Richard Symonds <richard.symonds(a)wikimedia.org.uk>wrote;wrote:
No, Aya, I don't think there will be a public
report - I don't think it's
happened in previous years.
I for one would not be happy with making my marking grid public because the
bidders didn't know that the marking grids were going to be made public -
and for that matter, neither did I! I am also a little worried about being
"second-guessed" by the community at large. Imagine, *for example,* if the
jury was split down the middle, with half hating the Mexico bid and half
loving it: it could be very damaging for the volunteer team morale to show
that not everyone supported them, and it might damage the conference.
Perhaps in future it would be a good thing to do...
However, I see where you're coming from - it would be good to have feedback
on the individual bids for posterity's sake, and to make sure that mistakes
or omissions aren't repeated in future...
Richard Symonds
Wikimedia UK
0207 065 0992
Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and
Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered
Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT.
United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia
movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who
operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects).
*Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control
over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.*
On 22 April 2014 16:27, Aya Mahfouz <mahfouz.saif.elyazal(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Thanks Richard for the reply! Will there be any
public report with a
matrix
indicating the scores of the bidding cities in
each judging criterion?
Kind Regards,
Aya Saif El-yazal Mahfouz
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Richard Symonds <
richard.symonds(a)wikimedia.org.uk> wrote:
> Christopher, Aya,
>
> Speaking as a jury member, the reason we disqualified Bali and Dar es
> Salaam was that those two bids were not really complete enough to
score.
>
> Richard Symonds
> Wikimedia UK
> 0207 065 0992
>
> Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England
and
> Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered
Charity No.1144513.
Registered
Office
4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A
4LT.
> United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia
> movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation
(who
> operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects).
>
> *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal
control
over
Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.*
On 21 April 2014 21:03, Aya Mahfouz <mahfouz.saif.elyazal(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> Congratulations to Wikimedia Mexico and Mexico City!
>
> I add my voice to that of Cooper concerning the criteria of choosing
the
> > winner for 2015. In addition to the cities that Cooper has
mentioned, I
> > would like to know what happened with
Bali's bid too.
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> > Aya Saif El-yazal Mahfouz
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Christopher Cooper <
> > ct-cooper.wikimedia.ml(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > > Congratulations to Wikimedia Mexico and all those that helped put
the
> bid
> > > together. I believe Mexico City will turn out to be a great place
to
> host
> > > Wikimania and I look forward to attending.
> > >
> > > Regardless, I hope when appropriate, the reasons Mexico City were
> chosen
> > > and where other bids could have done better will be posted
somewhere
> for
> > > digestion as done in previous years. In particular, while the bid
was
> >
clearly lacking, it would be helpful to have an official answer to
why
> the
> > Dar es Salaam was disqualified.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Christopher
> > User: CT Cooper
> >
> >
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:CT_Cooper
> >
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:CT_Cooper
> >
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:CT_Cooper
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list
> > Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
?subject=unsubscribe>
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list
> > Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>