On 8/24/07, Ayelie <ayelie.at.large(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I also support the rest of Brianna's
statement. WMF is allowed to use
own project for purposes such as hosting its own
copyrighted logos, and
have very obvious licenses for such cases.
Creating a whole new project
for logos, which would have to be monitored and
administered to ensure
only valid logos are uploaded, etc., would be a
pain and is utterly
pointless when WMF already has Commons.
Creating a whole new project for WMF logos is caps-worthy silly.
Creating a new one for non-WMF non-free logos is probably silly to,
but it's MUCH better than forcing commons to take them.
Both things have been discussed here, so lets be clear about which
ones were talking about.
Yes, pardon me. "Creating a whole new project just for *WMF* logos". I was
not speaking about non-free non-WMF logos. :)
~Editor at Large