I would like to know what the current policy is (if any) for people who are strongly suspected of violating copyright of content that was produced on Wikimedia projects. I'm not talking about people dumping copyrighted content onto a Wikimedia project, but somebody thinking that the content is free and therefore is in the public domain and they are free to use it in any way they want. I guess we should feel flattered that this is happening, and I'm going to give a specific example: http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Lord_of_the_Flies This Wikibook has been slightly modified and copied onto a number of websites, including some very commercial sites that are actually charging even for access to this content. See: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=%22During+an+unnamed+time+… This was marked as a copyright violation, and I think it is... of Wikibooks material. What is interesting here is that it is not a wholesale mirror of Wikibooks (there are some of those), but rather a slight modification to the content and trying to pass it off as original compositions. These websites are quite sleazy as well anyway, because they are selling term papers for lazy students, but it is still interesting that they would pick content that originated on a Wikimedia website. As this Wikibook has been around for a couple of years and the full edit history is available to show each edit and change, I think it is obvious that the content was created at en.wikibooks originally, at least to veteran Wikimedia users. I suspect this is going to be a larger problem in the future. -- Robert Scott Horning