On 1 March 2010 00:06, church.of.emacs.ml <church.of.emacs.ml(a)googlemail.com> wrote: Judging from (an older version of?) the website, it's a general non-commercial license on all submissions: ::: The archive contains "free" sheet music, free for non-commercial usage. This ::: means that you may download the files and print paper copies, but neither ::: the files nor the paper copies may be sold. (...) http://www.daimi.au.dk/~reccmo/scores/Introduction.html#copyright I suspect the older (& definitionally public domain) material, could be rehosted, but we'd have to seperate that out from the rest, and then tackle the problem of whether any "editing" people have done to them gives rise to new copyrights... -- - Andrew Gray andrew.gray(a)dunelm.org.uk

David Gerard wrote: What organisations like this, or new projects like the almanac proposal, need is encouragement to find funding for their own sites. WMF's size gives it a big advantage in fundraising, but a diversity of sites is healthy for the state of online information. We are familiar with nearly all the intellectual conflicts going around, but the danger in our addiction to reliability is in the marginalization of alternative views because of technical interpretations of the rules. We need more of these independent sites, each with its own policies, its own legal risks, and own funding. Ec

On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 9:31 AM, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote: They may brag about it but trying to get in touch with them about acquiring projects can be daunting and hard. Sincerely, Laura Hale