Just adding to what Phoebe said (and sorry to top-post): my recommendations
are not finalized and have not been submitted formally to the Board. I
don't intend to submit them as-is: they will be shaped by the discussion
that's been happening thus far, by my own evolving views, and by input from
the Board at its meeting. What I am looking for out of the Board meeting is
to get nearer to a consensus WRT what direction we want to take.
Thanks,
Sue
On Jan 30, 2012 8:02 AM, "phoebe ayers" <phoebe.wiki(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 3:18 PM, En Pine
<deyntestiss(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
Phoebe,
On this agenda, could you give more detail about the topic "Paid editing
discussion"? There is a current discussion on EN at the Village Pump
regarding, among other things, PR personnel who edit on Wikipedia in ways
that might violate NPOV and COI policy. It would be good to know if the
Board is taking up this specific subject. Alternatively, if "paid editing
discussion" instead is about editors which will be paid by WMF to edit, I
think the community would want to know that this is will be discussed.
Thanks,
Pine
Pine: the former, I believe; I haven't heard anything about the latter :)
Beria: the calendar is posted here --
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fundraising_and_Funds_Dissemination
As I understand it we are going to try to get quite indepth into the
recommendations at this meeting, and see if there is consensus to
date, but not take a final vote.
-- phoebe
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l