On 12 September 2011 21:02, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:
Any comment from the Wikinews contributors who just posted to foundation-l saying everything was fine and people saying it wasn't were clueless?
Several Wikinews regulars have made comments about the fork on wikinews-l, if anyone wants to see another viewpoint on OpenGlobe and the future of Wikinews:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikinews-l/2011-September/002034.html (and several posts following)
Regards.
-Tempodivalse
I guess it was time for a bold move.
~K
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Tempodivalse r2d2.strauss@verizon.net wrote:
On 12 September 2011 21:02, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:
Any comment from the Wikinews contributors who just posted to foundation-l saying everything was fine and people saying it wasn't were clueless?
Several Wikinews regulars have made comments about the fork on wikinews-l, if anyone wants to see another viewpoint on OpenGlobe and the future of Wikinews:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikinews-l/2011-September/002034.html (and several posts following)
Regards.
-Tempodivalse
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org