There are opinions on Commons that Moeller's statement in this list ("[W]e've consistently held that faithful reproductions of two-dimensional public domain works which are nothing more than reproductions should be considered public domain for licensing purposes") has been "overruled" by Mike Godwin's statement (which was adressed on a Wikisource case) See http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons_talk:Licensing#About_Bridgeman_vs… We should not accept such nonsense. Klaus Graf