-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
As this thread demonstrates, and various poster's comments show, it is
important that *whoever* is in control at a given moment in time does in
fact have control. A corporation always acts through its officers and
agents. WMF is no different.
WMF has brilliant technical staff, as you all know. Additionally,
Delphine (who has some technical knowledge of her own) has taken an
interest in working on these problems and has been for some time.
There is nothing to fear on the part of Foundation's ownership of
domains. Challenges exist, and a huge some of money could be spent to
buy more, of course.
Florence Devouard wrote:
Robert Horning wrote:
Florence Devouard wrote:
Platonides wrote:
BTW: Who will take care of the domains now Brad
resigns?
Reality check guys.
<*snip*>
anthere
Considering that the announcement of Brad's resignation just occured, it
shouldn't be surprising that this is one issue that has just come up.
And while I am not questioning Brad's integrity here, I am pointing out
that a less than honorable person could take advantage of the situation
and move the domains to some other server farm and do all sorts of other
damage. This is precisely why the "administrative contact" person
should be somebody with absolutely stellar integrity and has the full
faith and trust of not only the board but the entire community, and why
I believe this to be a very valid question.
Whilst I have no worry at all about Brad integrity on this, my concern
was rather that for privacy reasons, I felt not confortable with us
having to read Brad mails to be able to follow up, in particular
automated systems such as registrations of domain names or trademarks.
It feels best to sometimes use generic email addresses, so that any
employee can follow up, and the address can be easily redirected to
another employee in case of cease of activity, holidays, illness, or
whatever.
This is also the interest of using a press at
wikimedia.org rather than
sandy email. Better scaling and no pit when the person is not available.
ant
While in the long run any such usurption of the
WMF domains would
eventually come back under the control of the WMF, it would be a very
miserable several months if somebody were to mess things up in this
way. Considering the way vandals try to mess up our projects, this
would be the ultimate vandalism ploy if this domain registration was
messed up. It could be far more damaging than a rogue admin or even
steward.
I have no doubt that at the moment the WMF has this issue under control,
and that certainly any formalities that would also involve Brad would be
done as a matter of courtesy as well.
-- Robert Horning.
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGBYOH5txwQhyxnbIRAq5ZAJ9f4TVxHVmrh8UHJKhIpjoOINt/6wCdG6Xy
HM3SAmpM65yP8sGj2Xcfyl4=
=Ihdf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----