May I ask a question:
Do you think it's ethical to ignore community demand for an explanation or
a statement for *three weeks *and then issue a statement just within *three
hours* after the story publishes in BBC
<http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-35411208> ? Is publicity and public
image of WMF BoT is this important to you comparing to what community asks?
Note: the BBC story has published in "2016-01-26T18:10:21+00:00" UTC. You
can check when the statement has issued.
I really really want to be mistaken, please tell me I'm mistaken
Best
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 5:50 AM Elliott Eggleston <eeggleston(a)wikimedia.org>
wrote:
Let me echo the call for more frequent, substantive
updates from the board.
Articles about the controversy are on Ars Techinca
<
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/01/editors-demand-ouster-of-wikimed…
and the BBC
<http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-35411208>, and have made
it
to the front page of Reddit
<
https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/42r7t3/wikipedia_editors_revol…
.
This has gone beyond diminishing the
staff's and community's trust in the
board and is now damaging the image of the entire movement. The idea that
"Wikipedia is something special" where integrity and transparency are
priorities has attracted editors, donors, and employees. Let's not lose
that.
-Elliott
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Lodewijk <lodewijk(a)effeietsanders.org>
wrote:
> Hi Alice,
> thanks for the update. It's been
quite a while - and you don't seem to
give
a clear time table for further updates. The
silence is damaging, and I
hope
it goes away quickly, allowing some honest
conversation. I can understand
that you want full information, but please also note that the
conversation
in the community continues, with or without the
board (whether we like it
or not) - and I'd prefer your voices of reason to be part of that. Could
you at least check back every few days to confirm you're still discussing
it, that there's still investigation going on, etc? For us, it is hard to
differentiate between nothing going on, or busy discussions in a
backroom.
> After this all is over, maybe it is
good to sit back, and consider some
> kind of protocol or standard approach for a next time - because there
> always will be a next time.
> Best,
> Lodewijk
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:14 PM, Alice Wiegand <awiegand(a)wikimedia.org>
> wrote:
> > Dear all,
> > the Board has read your messages and is discussing the concerns you
have
> > raised about Arnnon Geshuri’s appointment. We need to consider all
> > information and we have conversations among ourselves. Arnnon and the
> board
> > are listening to your worries and talking with community members,
> > considering people's opinions and his own next steps.
>
> > In the recent round of
appointments, the Board identified that we
needed
> support and expertise in two areas:
financial oversight and planning,
and
> > human resources. Kelly and Arnnon were identified through the process,
> > reviewed alongside other nominees, and selected as finalists based on
> their
> > expertise and backgrounds. We all agreed they were excellent candidates
> and
> > people, and supported their progress as finalists.
>
> > We understand this
conversation will continue, and we will continue to
> > monitor it. However, we want to be clear that the Board approved Arnnon
> > unanimously and still believes he is a valuable member of the team.
>
> > Please see this as a brief
update. We owe you a more detailed response,
> and
> > we plan to come back to you with more information soon.
>
> > Alice.
>
>
>
> > --
> > Alice Wiegand
> > Board of Trustees
> > Wikimedia Foundation
>
> > Support Free Knowledge:
https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> >
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>