hi there,
whatever the protocol is, it should be explicit. My general feeling is that
we have too little rather than too many opportunities to understand what
people propose, represent, want to achieve, understand. From that point
of view, it is valuable to allow reaching out larger audiences, as Jan
writes.
However, as Tito notes, canvassing votes in return for favors is something
we definitely should reject - as it is pretty much more or less corruption.
best,
dj "pundit"
--
_____________________________
<https://nerds.kozminski.edu.pl/>
Dariusz Jemielniak, Ph.D., Full Professor, head of MINDS
<https://nerds.kozminski.edu.pl/>
(Management in Networked and Digital Societies), Kozminski University
Polish Academy of Sciences corresponding member
faculty associate Berkman-Klein Center for Internet and Society
<https://cyber.harvard.edu/>, Harvard University
*Key books*: Collaborative Society
<https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/collaborative-society> (2020, MIT Press,
with A. Przegalinska), Thick Big Data
<https://global.oup.com/academic/product/thick-big-data-9780198839705?cc=gb&lang=en>
(2020, Oxford University Press), Common Knowlege?
<https://www.sup.org/books/title/?id=24010> (2014, Stanford University
Press)
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 2:25 PM Jan Ainali <ainali.jan(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Den ons 30 juni 2021 kl 13:49 skrev টিটো দত্ত Tito
Dutta <
trulytito(a)gmail.com>gt;:
I believe, any process where "vote count" is the "only" way to decide
the
winners, appropriate canvassing policy should be a behavioral guideline.
On the contrary, I believe that in actual votes, in contrast to our
regular consensus seeking processes onwiki, campaigning should be
explicitly encouraged. That being said, behavioral guidelines could still
apply on certain channels, but getting votes by talking about your platform
and what you want to achieve if you win should not be disallowed in general.
Jan Ainali
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org…
To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
--
__________________________________
prof. dr hab. Dariusz Jemielniak kierownik katedry MINDS
<https://nerds.kozminski.edu.pl/>, Akademia Leona Koźmińskiego
członek korespondent Polskiej Akademii Nauk <https://pan.pl/>
faculty associate Berkman-Klein Center for Internet and Society
<https://cyber.harvard.edu/>, Harvard University
Ważniejsze książki: Collaborative Society
<https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/collaborative-society> (2020, MIT Press, z
A. Przegalińską), Thick Big Data
<https://global.oup.com/academic/product/thick-big-data-9780198839705?cc=gb&lang=en>
(2020,
Oxford University Press), Common Knowledge?
<https://www.sup.org/books/title/?id=24010> (2014, Stanford University
Press)
*Ostatnie artykuły:*
- Jędrzej Chrzanowski, Julia Sołek, Dariusz Jemielniak, Wojciech Fendler
(2021) Assessing Public Interest Based on Wikipedia’s Most Visited
Medical Articles During the SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak
<https://www.jmir.org/2021/4/e26331/>, *Journal of Medical Internet
Research*, 23(4)::e26331
- Natalia Banasik-Jemielniak, Dariusz Jemielniak, Wojciech Pędzich
(2021) Intercessory Rote Prayer, Life Longevity and the Mortality of
Roman Catholic Bishops: An Exploratory Study
<https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10943-021-01214-9>, *Journal
of Religion and Health*,
doi.org/10.1007/s10943-021-01214-9
- Natalia Banasik-Jemielniak, Dariusz Jemielniak, Maciej Wilamowski
(2021) Psychology and Wikipedia: Measuring Psychology Journals’ Impact
by Wikipedia Citations
<http://nerds.kozminski.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Psychology-and-Wikipedia-measuring-psychology-journals-impact-by-Wikipedia-citations.pdf>
, *Social Science Computer Review, *doi.org/10.1177/0894439321993836
- Agata Stasik, Dariusz Jemielniak (2021) Public involvement in risk
governance in the internet era: impact of new rules of building trust and
credibility
<http://nerds.kozminski.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Public-involvement-in-risk-governance-in-the-internet-era-impact-of-new-rules-of-building-trust-and-credibility.pdf>,
Journal of Risk Research,
doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2020.1864008