-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk0hAOoACgkQst0AR/DaKHvrkgCfc5hjal43X+LQOmj7SXcLtKVU 7UAAn131m23QbZ7hS5DiwYZ/Ti4S/t9r =qoEt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 00:30:09 +0100 From: Erkan Yilmaz erkan77@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Wikimania 2010 videos To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Message-ID: AANLkTins3PdBh4sYAcE6mEk2Ho3z1UfqoA6nGeOTidg2@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 last info I read was: http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimania-l/2010-October/002437.html On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Mike.lifeguard mike.lifeguard@gmail.comwrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello, > > Now that registration is open for Wikimania 2011, I wonder why the > videos from Wikimania 2010 are not uploaded somewhere yet. > > Could the 2010 organizers please comment on this state of affairs? > > - -Mike > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAk0hAOoACgkQst0AR/DaKHvrkgCfc5hjal43X+LQOmj7SXcLtKVU > 7UAAn131m23QbZ7hS5DiwYZ/Ti4S/t9r > =qoEt > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > -- Find me at: Systems Thinking World Group: http://www.linkedin.com/groups?home=&gid=2639211&trk=anet_ug_hm ********************************************************************************************** This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden. Diese eMail enthaelt vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschuetzte Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese eMail irrtuemlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail ist nicht gestattet. ********************************************************************************************** ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2011 22:41:24 -0500 From: Chris Lee theornamentalist@gmail.com Subject: [Foundation-l] Future donation drive suggestion To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Message-ID: AANLkTi=Gs+oWVhV63fiziYS-qkxn1B2oLaGA0AM1T4iq@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello, I received an email earlier today, in which the person who was the subject of an article I wrote last year decided to make a donation to the WMF. Excerpted from the email: "Has it occurred to the people running Wikipedia that some people might think Wikipedia is affiliated with Wikileaks? It would be an easy mistake to make, and even I balked because I am totally anti-Wikileaks. I found a page Wiki stating you were not affiliated, but you should really include that info with your donation requests. I suspect thousands of would-be donors did not donate because they were not totally sure and didn't want to take the chance. Please pass this piece of info onto the people in charge, because I think it's a really important point to stress!" Regardless of how I feel on the matter, this person does make a good point. I have come across many people who view Wikileaks as irresponsible and dangerous. Calling out our non-affiliation with Wikileaks on the donation page seems fairly drastic. However, because this may be a common misconception, clarification should be made *somewhere*. Chris ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2011 22:55:52 -0500 From: Chad innocentkiller@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Future donation drive suggestion To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Message-ID: AANLkTikmGsehvB_iOGukO3rQHU3r8=zz_u4LHuzMjSHh@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 10:41 PM, Chris Lee theornamentalist@gmail.com wrote: > Regardless of how I feel on the matter, this person does make a good point. > I have come across many people who view Wikileaks as irresponsible and > dangerous. Calling out our non-affiliation with Wikileaks on the donation > page seems fairly drastic. However, because this may be a common > misconception, clarification should be made *somewhere*. > A blog post on the subject was posted back in early December. http://blog.wikimedia.org/blog/2010/12/09/what?s-in-a-name-in-the-case-of-?w... -Chad ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 00:10:09 -0500 From: MZMcBride z@mzmcbride.com Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Future donation drive suggestion To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Message-ID: C946C461.E42F%z@mzmcbride.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Chris Lee wrote: > Regardless of how I feel on the matter, this person does make a good point. > I have come across many people who view Wikileaks as irresponsible and > dangerous. Calling out our non-affiliation with Wikileaks on the donation > page seems fairly drastic. However, because this may be a common > misconception, clarification should be made *somewhere*. It's in the FAQ: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/FAQ/en If you feel it should be elsewhere on wikimediafoundation.org, leave a note at http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Foundation_wiki_feedback (which has its own obnoxious banner about WikiLeaks currently) and I can update the site as appropriate. MZMcBride ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 01:49:26 -0500 From: Anthony wikimail@inbox.org Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Future donation drive suggestion To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Message-ID: AANLkTimNXNMEBRpT+_JxPi-JMdP4BpY=G56n5j-mM3FA@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > "Has it occurred to the people running Wikipedia that some people might > think Wikipedia is affiliated with Wikileaks? > It would be an easy mistake to make, and even I balked because I am totally > anti-Wikileaks. The bigger question is whether or not it has occurred to Julian Assange. Since people keep confusing the two, and some want to donate to one and not the other, maybe in his next fundraiser Assange can refer to himself as the Wikipedia Executive Director. ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 17:55:16 +0900 From: KIZU Naoko aphaia@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Wikimania 2010 videos To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Message-ID: AANLkTimYZnQ8GZyo1toT+pnxNATjfRXPrS2+u9tu6EHP@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Thirded On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Erkan Yilmaz erkan77@gmail.com wrote: > +1 > > last info I read was: > http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimania-l/2010-October/002437.html I say so, because the quality of stream was amazing so that sometimes it gave a much clearer view of slideshow than with my own eyes. They deserve more wider publication than just being watched at that moment. I'm looking forward to watch these videos really. > > On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Mike.lifeguard mike.lifeguard@gmail.comwrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Hello, >> >> Now that registration is open for Wikimania 2011, I wonder why the >> videos from Wikimania 2010 are not uploaded somewhere yet. >> >> Could the 2010 organizers please comment on this state of affairs? >> >> - -Mike >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) >> >> iEYEARECAAYFAk0hAOoACgkQst0AR/DaKHvrkgCfc5hjal43X+LQOmj7SXcLtKVU >> 7UAAn131m23QbZ7hS5DiwYZ/Ti4S/t9r >> =qoEt >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----