On 29 November 2011 21:51, emijrp <emijrp(a)gmail.com> wrote: heard is a I think the first step would be to try and figure out if women are visiting the site and not donating or just not visiting at all.

You would also want to make sure there really is a significant imbalance and that it's not just that men are more likely to fill out the survey form.

_______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

2011/11/29 Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> So, the first step would be to try and figure out if women are visiting the site and not editing or just not visiting at all, before saying nonsense about sexism and Wikipedia community. That affects to all surveys, again. Looks like people only care about surveys which say what they want to read. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

* The WMF spends over $2 million on fundraising alone

* The travel budget is nearly $2m (that's right, two million dollars in travel costs)

* The budget includes a whopping $14 million on staffing costs (at the planned 117 number of staff, that is nearly $120k per staff member)

* The last fundraiser sent over $6 million to chapters, with little insight or transparency into how that money is spent

* The number of staff is planned to more than double between 2009-10 and 2011-12, with almost 70% of that increase attributed to non-tech staff

And, let's be honest - aside from the $3m or so spent on hosting,

But the 11-12 plan called for the Visual Editor and Wikimedia Labs to go into initial production mode in December 2011 - which is in two days, without any recent announcements or updates about either improvement. (Labs closed beta has 13 users in its active list, defined as more than 1 edit in the last 30 days. Only 2 have more than 10 edits in that period.).

On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Nathan <nawrich(a)gmail.com> wrote: Hey Nathan, a bit OT from the thread title, but just clarifying a couple of points: In FY 2010-11, WMF raised $23M in contributions, not counting $ restricted to future time periods. In the same time period, $2.142M expenses were allocated to fundraising, including $556K in credit card processing fees. [1][2] That's altogether less than 10 cents on the dollar, which by the standards of charity watchdog organizations, is qualified as an excellent fundraising efficiency (cf. [3][4]). This includes very different types of fundraising activity (grant-writing and grant management, donor cultivation, usability testing of credit card forms, etc.). The 2011-12 travel budget is $1.742M [5]. A little bit of detail as to how this breaks out is included in the Audited Financials FAQ [1], but in a nutshell: * WMF is a global organization and is doing work on the ground in many corners of the world, in partnership with chapters where they exist, and WMF staff routinely have to travel internationally as a normal part of their day-to-day work; * WMF sponsors volunteer travel extensively, for Wikimania, for hackathons, for WMF site visits and meetings, and for many other purposes; * Many contractors work for WMF from all over the world, and it's part of the cost of doing business in this way that you bring people together for face-to-face meetings on a regular basis. Travel is regulated by the WMF travel policy which ensures that individual travel expenses are not excessive or profligate. [6] The 2010-11 staffing budget is $13.3M. [5] Staffing costs include payroll taxes, recruiting costs, and benefits, and of course pay bands for different roles vary significantly, but are consistent with similar non-profit organizations, i.e. below the market rate paid at for-profit companies. More background about the guiding principles of Wikimedia's compensation practices can be found in [7]. Chapters processing donations in the 2010 fundraiser were required, as part of their participation, to commit to various obligations. See [8] for the Wikimedia UK agreement as an example. Specifically with regard to transparency, WMF, community, and chapters have worked together to ensure that key information about chapter activities and financial information can be easily found. [9] At its July 2011 Board meeting, the WMF Board of Trustees agreed to a letter regarding fundraising accountability [10] which further emphasized principles of accountability, transparency, and fairness, and led to shifting chapters increasingly towards applying for grants to fund program work. Program plans both for chapters receiving grants and processing payments through the fundraiser are shared and reviewed publicly. [11] The planned staffing increase from FY 2009 to FY 2012 is from 50 to 117 (+67). [12] In the same time period, tech staffing specifically is projected to grow from 22 to 50 (+28). That's 41.8% of the increase, not 30%. The tech share is higher in the current fiscal year, where it accounts for 56% of the planned staffing growth. Simply put, the Global Development and Community Department did not exist and were newly created; WMF has decided to tackle new areas of work that never happened before, as exemplified e.g. by the Summer of Research, the Global Education Program, etc. The costs that you find labeled "Internet hosting" in the Annual Plan should never be confused with the cost of hosting Wikipedia. Those are two very different numbers (and we should make this clearer in the next plan). The "hosting cost" only covers bandwidth and operating expenses for running our sever farms. There's a separate cost center called "capital expenditures" which covers actual hardware purchases ($2.6M budgeted in 2011-12). To arrive at a meaningful "cost of hosting Wikipedia" (without any software improvements) one would have to back out of that experimental projects like Wikimedia Labs, but further add essential engineering staffing and contractors. Updates can always be found in Wikimedia's monthly engineering report. The October report is here: http://blog.wikimedia.org/2011/11/03/wikimedia-engineering-october-2011-rep… As noted there, labs has been launched for first project-level access. Projects are listed here: https://labsconsole.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Ask/-5B-5BResource-20Type::p… The goal, as stated in the annual plan, was to "develop [a] sandbox for research, prototyping, and tools development, with initial hardware build-out and first project access by December 2011." This goal has been exceeded thanks to good progress at the NOLA hackathon which enabled us to give first individuals (including non-WMF staffers) access to labs instances before then. (Edit counts on the labsconsole wiki aren't a useful measure of activity as this is about providing virtualized hardware to volunteers, while the console merely serves as an administrative front-end.) We're now focusing on solidifying the architecture and infrastructure, adding toolserver-like DB replication capabilities, etc. As for the Visual Editor, we're still aiming to deploy a first user-facing prototype in December. As you can see by following the recent commits [13], the current codebase is now being merged into a MediaWiki extension which makes it possible to invoke the editor (initially only in a sandboxed mode). On the topic of diversity, I do think as Wikimedia engages in more and more specific ways to advance its mission (e.g. all the work with cultural institutions), we're creating new avenues for asking for support and receiving it. WMF is simply focusing its efforts on the one avenue which has always yielded the highest return: asking our users for support. As long as record numbers answer that call every year, it's legitimately the highest priority to focus on improving it further. All best, Erik [1] http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/foundation/7/72/Audit_FAQ_2011_Final.… [2] http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/foundation/a/ac/FINAL_10_11From_KPMG.… [3] http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=glossary.word&word=Fundra… [4] http://supportingadvancement.com/faq/cost_per_dollar_raised.htm [5] http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/foundation/3/37/2011-12_Wikimedia_Fou… (p.53) [6] http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Travel_Policy [7] http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/foundation/2/2a/Wikimedia_Foundation_… [8] http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/2010_Fundraiser/Agreement [9] For example, via http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Reports [10] http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Minutes/2011-08-03#Appended: [11] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_chapters/Plans_2011-2012 [12] http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/foundation/3/37/2011-12_Wikimedia_Fou… (p. 36) [13] http://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?path=%2Ftrunk%2Fextensions%2FVisualEdi… -- Erik Möller VP of Engineering and Product Development, Wikimedia Foundation Support Free Knowledge: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l