was quite useful for a first check.
What I was looking for was exactly such a list, but annotated with which
requirements they fulfilled, but as James says, it can be surmised mostly.
I was curious whether staff and contractors of the Foundation or the
MediaWiki developers had a particularly large impact on the results,
especially considering that the number of voters have declined so much last
time, but looking through that list it does not seem like that.
Thank you for the help,
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 5:25 PM James Alexander <jalexander(a)wikimedia.org>
Aye, as Katie said we do not keep track of who voted
requirements (and many of them are, indeed, eligible under multiple
requirements). You can see a list at
surmise some of it from there but once they voted, if they were eligible,
they went into one giant bucket.
(415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Katie Chan <ktc(a)ktchan.info> wrote:
On 06/04/2015 18:14, Denny Vrandečić wrote:
> regarding the Wikimedia Foundation elections 2013, I was trying to
> breakdown of the voters, i.e. how many voted
based on which
editors, developers, staff and contractors, and board members,
I could not find anything.
I would appreciate a pointer to that data.
As far as I can remember, that's not something that's collected. A list
of eligible voters are created and fed to the software, which either let
or don't let someone vote. All votes are recorded the same regardless of
how someone is qualified to vote, which may of course be via more than
Any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent the view of any organisation the
author is associated with or employed by.
Experience is a good school but the fees are high.
- Heinrich Heine
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/