Hmm. Once again, I largely agree with WSC. Unless I'm missing something, this idea is
largely about fundraising, and I think it could introduce more problems than it solves.
The evidence that I've seen suggest that WMF is very successful at fundraising, but
has ongoing difficulties with making progress toward the goal to get 200,000 active
editors by 2015. So, I see little reason to implement page adoption if the goal is to
fundraise, but if there is something about the proposal that's relevant to improving
the active editor count from the current 85,000, I'd be interested in at least
learning more about that.
Show replies by date