This is covered in depth at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/Orangemoody
Good job to wikimedians and the WMF!
Regards, Richard.
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Matt Campbell <mcc99(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
ICYMI...
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/wikipedia-rocked-by-rogue-editor…
Guess no organization can be completely safe vs. a few bad actors
exploiting their positions of trust in it. But with so many people acting
as voluntary editors, it's hard to see how the WF can protect itself from
exposure when stuff like this happens. I mean, some of the victims are
sure to sue the WF, since where there's money and a criminal offense,
there's usually lawsuits. But worse than that is the black eye it gives
the WF.
No winners in this mess. Sad day all around.
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
--
The greatest collection of shared knowledge in history. Help
Wikipedia, participate now:
https://en.wikipedia.org/