On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 12:51:13 -0500, Marc Riddell
<michaeldavid86(a)comcast.net> wrote:
> It's really unfortunate that blacking out
Wikimedia projects is
becoming
> an
> accepted method of protest. Maybe we should start keeping track of how
> often different projects are blacked out, and for what purpose. When it
> happened to the Italian Wikipedia, it was a first-ever event that no
one
> thought would happen again. When it happened to
the English Wikipedia,
it
was a uniquely
forceful global statement that many argued might never
happen again for many reasons. Now Serbia, next who knows?
Nathan, what problems do you see with this method of protest?
Marc Riddell
I am not Nathan, but the obvious argument is that a strong medicine only
remains strong if used rarely. If one starts using it on a regular basis
one gets adapted and the medicine does not have the required action
anymore. The same thing is here: one can blank out a Wikipedia main page
for a day and to exercise protest, but the protest is only visible if the
blanking is exceptional. If it starts to happen on a monthly basis, the
only reaction would be that people get upset because Wikipedia is not
available.
Cheers
Yaroslav
PS I have no idea about the Serbian situation, and I am glad they do not
need to discuss it anymore.