That's certainly an idea.
I don't think "post-its" are on the table right now - that's probably a
bit
outside the project's scope.
On 29 November 2011 20:06, rupert THURNER <rupert.thurner(a)gmail.com> wrote:
one usage could be to support photo competitions as
wiki loves monuments,
where a jury had to select good photos out of 160000 submitted.
On Nov 29, 2011 8:51 PM, "Oliver Keyes" <okeyes(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
It'd be good! I'm not sure what the
usefulness would be, though. So, the
two aims behind the AFT:
- To prompt greater feedback from readers on the quality of content;
- To try (through the calls to action, which have actually been pretty
successful) to prompt readers to edit.
I'm not sure how applicable these would be to Commons. I mean, how many
"readers" per se does the project get? The interface doesn't really lend
itself to browsing. It'd also be awkward trying to work out what they
could
actually do, or what the feedback would be useful
for; with traditional
wikis, if people go "this article sucks" we can fix it. If people go
"this
image sucks" we can't necessarily take a
new one, or tweak the old one to
make it better.
Still, it's an interesting idea. I do like the possibility of maybe
having
a rating box that prompts readers "do you
have an image of this? If so,
why
not upload it?" or whatever if they provide
a sucky rating for a photo.
I'll drop the devs a note and see what their plans are in this field :).
On 29 November 2011 19:36, rupert THURNER <rupert.thurner(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> that looks really nice, as well the intention behind it! for pictures,
or
> commons in general, a rating model like the
one already implements
would
be
> more appropriate, what you think?
> On Nov 29, 2011 8:20 PM, "Oliver Keyes" <okeyes(a)wikimedia.org>
wrote:
>
> > Well, if you've seen AFT5 (you may not have, so -
> >
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Article_Feedback_Tool/Version_5
)
> we're moving away from
"rating" articles.
>
> On 29 November 2011 19:13, rupert THURNER <rupert.thurner(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > would it be possible to have a rating for pictures as well?
> > On Nov 29, 2011 6:17 PM, "Oliver Keyes" <okeyes(a)wikimedia.org>
wrote:
>
> > Hey guys!
> >
> > Another AFT session - this one will be in #wikimedia-office on 2
> December,
> > at 19:00 UTC. If you're vaguely interested in playing around with
> > prototypes, you should attend - we'll have a lot of cool stuff to
poke
at
> > (and then complain about when something breaks and it goes all
melty).
> >
> > --
> > Oliver Keyes
> > Community Liason, Product Development
> > Wikimedia Foundation
> > _______________________________________________
> > foundation-l mailing list
> > foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > foundation-l mailing list
> > foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Oliver Keyes
> > Community Liason, Product Development
> > Wikimedia Foundation
> > _______________________________________________
> > foundation-l mailing list
> > foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe:
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
--
Oliver Keyes
Community Liason, Product Development
Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
--
Oliver Keyes
Community Liason, Product Development
Wikimedia Foundation