Hello,
It has been over a year since the first commission was appointed. It was high time for renewal. I would like to thank you our previous team, Nathan, Steve and Enders for their help over the past year (their task was not always very easy), and welcome the new team * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mackensen * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Rebecca * http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Hei_ber
The ombudsman commission is tasked with processing complaints about violations of the privacy policy on any Wikimedia project, in particular concerning the use of CheckUser tools. The ombudsman is tasked with investigating cases of such policy breach or CheckUser abuse for the board in an official manner. They will mediate between the complainant and the respondent (usually a CheckUser, bureaucrat, administrator, or arbitration committee member). When legally necessary, the ombudsman will assist the general counsel, the executive director or the board in handling the case.
Since the issue was raised during the year, let me repeat that the commission is not here to fix various disagreements and abuse reports, but is dedicated to issues related to privacy policy infringments.
These people were selected to provide a healthy mix of language, project and gender diversity. Two have been CU, so are familiar with this role and the issues related to CU activities. The third is deeply interested in privacy policy issues. All have been highly recommanded. I hope you will feel confortable with them joining this commission.
More on the commission here: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Ombudsman_commission
Best
Florence
On 24/11/2007, Florence Devouard anthere@anthere.org wrote:
Hello,
It has been over a year since the first commission was appointed. It was high time for renewal. I would like to thank you our previous team, Nathan, Steve and Enders for their help over the past year (their task was not always very easy), and welcome the new team
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mackensen
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Rebecca
- http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Hei_ber
The ombudsman commission is tasked with processing complaints about violations of the privacy policy on any Wikimedia project, in particular concerning the use of CheckUser tools. The ombudsman is tasked with investigating cases of such policy breach or CheckUser abuse for the board in an official manner. They will mediate between the complainant and the respondent (usually a CheckUser, bureaucrat, administrator, or arbitration committee member). When legally necessary, the ombudsman will assist the general counsel, the executive director or the board in handling the case.
Since the issue was raised during the year, let me repeat that the commission is not here to fix various disagreements and abuse reports, but is dedicated to issues related to privacy policy infringments.
These people were selected to provide a healthy mix of language, project and gender diversity. Two have been CU, so are familiar with this role and the issues related to CU activities. The third is deeply interested in privacy policy issues. All have been highly recommanded. I hope you will feel confortable with them joining this commission.
More on the commission here: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Ombudsman_commission
Best
Florence
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
Great new choices. I have a question: will the current Ombudsmen still be continuing, or are they being replaced?
Majorly wrote:
On 24/11/2007, Florence Devouard anthere@anthere.org wrote:
Hello,
It has been over a year since the first commission was appointed. It was high time for renewal. I would like to thank you our previous team, Nathan, Steve and Enders for their help over the past year (their task was not always very easy), and welcome the new team
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mackensen
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Rebecca
- http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Hei_ber
The ombudsman commission is tasked with processing complaints about violations of the privacy policy on any Wikimedia project, in particular concerning the use of CheckUser tools. The ombudsman is tasked with investigating cases of such policy breach or CheckUser abuse for the board in an official manner. They will mediate between the complainant and the respondent (usually a CheckUser, bureaucrat, administrator, or arbitration committee member). When legally necessary, the ombudsman will assist the general counsel, the executive director or the board in handling the case.
Since the issue was raised during the year, let me repeat that the commission is not here to fix various disagreements and abuse reports, but is dedicated to issues related to privacy policy infringments.
These people were selected to provide a healthy mix of language, project and gender diversity. Two have been CU, so are familiar with this role and the issues related to CU activities. The third is deeply interested in privacy policy issues. All have been highly recommanded. I hope you will feel confortable with them joining this commission.
More on the commission here: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Ombudsman_commission
Best
Florence
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
Great new choices. I have a question: will the current Ombudsmen still be continuing, or are they being replaced?
Previous team -> new team means that the current team will be replaced.
ant
On Nov 24, 2007 5:26 PM, Majorly axel9891@googlemail.com wrote:
Great new choices. I have a question: will the current Ombudsmen still be continuing, or are they being replaced?
Hm, from the words "previous team" and from the words "Former ombudsman users" on http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Ombudsman_commission I'd say no.
Michael
Hi Anthere - This is a great team, all of whom have my respect. My only question relates to transparency, and perhaps I just missed an announcement (which is entirely possible, given the way my life has been lately) but.... from where were these people drawn? Was there a call for volunteers? Did the board simply select highly qualified men and women (which is - in my opinion - entirely within their purview)? Was the legal counsel or the consultant to the board involved?
I have no issue with the group that was selected, nor with the mission of the group, I'm simply curious where the names came from.
Thanks, Philippe
-------------------------------------------------- From: "Florence Devouard" anthere@anthere.org Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2007 10:20 AM To: foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: [Foundation-l] Ombuds-wo-men commission
Hello,
It has been over a year since the first commission was appointed. It was high time for renewal. I would like to thank you our previous team, Nathan, Steve and Enders for their help over the past year (their task was not always very easy), and welcome the new team
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mackensen
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Rebecca
- http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Hei_ber
The ombudsman commission is tasked with processing complaints about violations of the privacy policy on any Wikimedia project, in particular concerning the use of CheckUser tools. The ombudsman is tasked with investigating cases of such policy breach or CheckUser abuse for the board in an official manner. They will mediate between the complainant and the respondent (usually a CheckUser, bureaucrat, administrator, or arbitration committee member). When legally necessary, the ombudsman will assist the general counsel, the executive director or the board in handling the case.
Since the issue was raised during the year, let me repeat that the commission is not here to fix various disagreements and abuse reports, but is dedicated to issues related to privacy policy infringments.
These people were selected to provide a healthy mix of language, project and gender diversity. Two have been CU, so are familiar with this role and the issues related to CU activities. The third is deeply interested in privacy policy issues. All have been highly recommanded. I hope you will feel confortable with them joining this commission.
More on the commission here: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Ombudsman_commission
Best
Florence
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
Philippe Beaudette wrote:
Hi Anthere - This is a great team, all of whom have my respect. My only question relates to transparency, and perhaps I just missed an announcement (which is entirely possible, given the way my life has been lately)
No, there was no formal announcement. The issue was mentionned now and then on this list and in other places. They were supposed to be there for one year and then... the issue kept being postponed, though it was raised frequently here and there.
but.... from where
were these people drawn?
Was there a call for volunteers?
No, there was none. From experience, it is best to focus on people who have an experience of check user tool (but avoid the most active of checkusers, as it is asked to ombudsmen to stop being CU... asking the most active ones would be problematic). I discussed the issue with various people I know and trust. On some channels. With Cary. Etc...
Did the board
simply select highly qualified men and women (which is - in my opinion - entirely within their purview)?
I selected these people based on recommandations of various parties. Then I asked feedback from the internal community.
Was the legal counsel or the consultant to
the board involved?
They are part of the internal community. I asked Mike a couple of times in the past 3 months to review the privacy policy, discuss with ombudsmen etc... I think neither Sue nor Mike could really bring much more, simply because they would rely on recommandations just as I did myself. I also have a community experience they do not have.
I have no issue with the group that was selected, nor with the mission of the group, I'm simply curious where the names came from.
Enlightened despotism :-)
Thanks, Philippe
From: "Florence Devouard" anthere@anthere.org Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2007 10:20 AM To: foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: [Foundation-l] Ombuds-wo-men commission
Hello,
It has been over a year since the first commission was appointed. It was high time for renewal. I would like to thank you our previous team, Nathan, Steve and Enders for their help over the past year (their task was not always very easy), and welcome the new team
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mackensen
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Rebecca
- http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Hei_ber
The ombudsman commission is tasked with processing complaints about violations of the privacy policy on any Wikimedia project, in particular concerning the use of CheckUser tools. The ombudsman is tasked with investigating cases of such policy breach or CheckUser abuse for the board in an official manner. They will mediate between the complainant and the respondent (usually a CheckUser, bureaucrat, administrator, or arbitration committee member). When legally necessary, the ombudsman will assist the general counsel, the executive director or the board in handling the case.
Since the issue was raised during the year, let me repeat that the commission is not here to fix various disagreements and abuse reports, but is dedicated to issues related to privacy policy infringments.
These people were selected to provide a healthy mix of language, project and gender diversity. Two have been CU, so are familiar with this role and the issues related to CU activities. The third is deeply interested in privacy policy issues. All have been highly recommanded. I hope you will feel confortable with them joining this commission.
More on the commission here: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Ombudsman_commission
Best
Florence
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
Anthere, thanks for the timely and informative reply. It's much appreciated.
Philippe
-------------------------------------------------- From: "Florence Devouard" Anthere9@yahoo.com Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2007 12:54 PM To: foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Ombuds-wo-men commission
Philippe Beaudette wrote:
Hi Anthere - This is a great team, all of whom have my respect. My only question relates to transparency, and perhaps I just missed an announcement (which is entirely possible, given the way my life has been lately)
No, there was no formal announcement. The issue was mentionned now and then on this list and in other places. They were supposed to be there for one year and then... the issue kept being postponed, though it was raised frequently here and there.
but.... from where
were these people drawn?
Was there a call for volunteers?
No, there was none. From experience, it is best to focus on people who have an experience of check user tool (but avoid the most active of checkusers, as it is asked to ombudsmen to stop being CU... asking the most active ones would be problematic). I discussed the issue with various people I know and trust. On some channels. With Cary. Etc...
Did the board
simply select highly qualified men and women (which is - in my opinion - entirely within their purview)?
I selected these people based on recommandations of various parties. Then I asked feedback from the internal community.
Was the legal counsel or the consultant to
the board involved?
They are part of the internal community. I asked Mike a couple of times in the past 3 months to review the privacy policy, discuss with ombudsmen etc... I think neither Sue nor Mike could really bring much more, simply because they would rely on recommandations just as I did myself. I also have a community experience they do not have.
I have no issue with the group that was selected, nor with the mission of the group, I'm simply curious where the names came from.
Enlightened despotism :-)
Thanks, Philippe
From: "Florence Devouard" anthere@anthere.org Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2007 10:20 AM To: foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: [Foundation-l] Ombuds-wo-men commission
Hello,
It has been over a year since the first commission was appointed. It was high time for renewal. I would like to thank you our previous team, Nathan, Steve and Enders for their help over the past year (their task was not always very easy), and welcome the new team
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mackensen
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Rebecca
- http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Hei_ber
The ombudsman commission is tasked with processing complaints about violations of the privacy policy on any Wikimedia project, in particular concerning the use of CheckUser tools. The ombudsman is tasked with investigating cases of such policy breach or CheckUser abuse for the board in an official manner. They will mediate between the complainant and the respondent (usually a CheckUser, bureaucrat, administrator, or arbitration committee member). When legally necessary, the ombudsman will assist the general counsel, the executive director or the board in handling the case.
Since the issue was raised during the year, let me repeat that the commission is not here to fix various disagreements and abuse reports, but is dedicated to issues related to privacy policy infringments.
These people were selected to provide a healthy mix of language, project and gender diversity. Two have been CU, so are familiar with this role and the issues related to CU activities. The third is deeply interested in privacy policy issues. All have been highly recommanded. I hope you will feel confortable with them joining this commission.
More on the commission here: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Ombudsman_commission
Best
Florence
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org