Just to be clear, there was no "only 2 representatives plus an ED" rule
mentioned in the registration process.
If there had been, then Wikimedia UK would have respected it.
Given that there wasn't, we thought it was useful to send more than 2
trustees, as we have many new Board members and it is important for them to
meet colleagues from other chapters and the WMF sooner rather than later!
Chris
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Fæ <faewik(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Cristian,
Yes. I sort of expected WMDE to be the ones implementing the 2+1
'rule' and if there was to be any exceptions for this to be discussed
before they added names to the registration page.
Anyway, I've already posted quite a bit on this thread, so I'll step
back a little - it's not like I'm even going myself. :-)
Fae
On 31 March 2014 14:45, Cristian Consonni <kikkocristian(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2014-03-31 11:47 GMT+02:00 Fæ
<faewik(a)gmail.com>om>:
This seems to not be the case
looking at the proposed attendee list[1] with the UK sending a massive
party of 8 people (excluding Wikimania representatives), significantly
larger than any other Chapter or Thorg.
Well, the question then is "can WM-UK explain the rationale for
sending such a large representation?"
C
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
--
faewik(a)gmail.com
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae
Personal and confidential, please do not circulate or re-quote.
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>