Actually the bullet points were from the SA constitution. Any comments on the sanctity of Gaddafi are my own. Extending my suggestion on the "rules" for wikibooks could have a simple statement of what the purpose of books is to serve, and then specify that any and all books will be evaluated by a special executive. Books found to be against the spirit of wikibooks will be removed and the subject listed on a banned list. An appeal should be allowed during which the people behind the controversial book may submit their reasoning as to why the book should remain. Once heard the executive should have a set period to decide. Once a decision is made, however, it is final. For instance: "Wikibooks are to offer specific guidance, education or knowledge on any topic with the specific limitation that the subject be one likely to benefit society. Where a subject is likely to cause harm (material or otherwise) then such a subject will be reviewed by the wikibooks executive. A current list of subjects specifically banned from wikibooks is as follows: - how to rape - how to commit an act of terrorism - .... and so on" The executive and other terms in the above can be defined and agreed upon. That way one person doesn't get saddled with making all the decisions, and - most importantly - there is a context to the decision making process and precedents can be set. --- Gavin