Dear Ad,
Could you please clarify the following;
Based on your email, does it mean that only candidates who express interest
in being part of the drafting committee before the 2nd round of global
conversations will be up for scrutiny? What about those that will be
fronted by affiliates and WMF?
On Fri, 18 Jun 2021, 15:29 , <ad(a)huikeshoven.org> wrote:
Dear all,
My intent is contributing to drafting a text of the Movement Charter which
will be ratified by the communities, the affiliates, and the WMF. IMHO this
will have to be an iterative process of community consultations. The
committee will produce texts and gather feedback from the communities - and
other stakeholders - in multiple rounds. This will be an open consultative
process, based on consent decision making. In the feedback rounds anyone is
allowed to raise objections against parts of the text. For the Charter to
be ratified in the end, the drafting committee will have to have resolved
any blocking objections, before asking anyone to ratify the text. A
succesfull committee will gather feedback frequently, and resolve issues
swiftly.
To come up with a workable first draft it would be convenient to have "the
whole system in the room", to be inclusive of the perspectives of all major
types of stakeholders involved. The composition of the committee, and the
method of selection of committee members should be without prejudice for
the composition of the Global Council, and the method of selection of
Global Council members. The major types of stakeholders within the
Wikimedia Movement are IMHO volunteer contributors to online content
project wikis (aka editors, users, or community members), members of small
affiliates, members of large affiliates, board members of affiliates, staff
of affiliates, board members of the Wikimedia Foundation, and staff of the
WMF.
The method of selection of Movement Charter Drafting Committee members
will be different for each group of stakeholders, of which there are three:
the WMF, the affiliates, and the community. IMHO I do belief the WMF board
and staff to be well capable through their internal decision making
processes to appoint to the Committee one or two board members, and a
couple of staff. Nobody outside WMF has any business in trying to influence
or determine who the WMF will appoint from their ranks. IMHO I do belief
the affiliates are well capable of through their method of liking, select,
elect, or appoint to the Committee some affiliate members, some affiliate
board members and some affiliate staff. Nobody outside the affiliates has
any business in trying to influence or determine who from the affiliates
will be on the Committee.
So, what about the community members on the Community. IMHO neither the
WMF nor the affiliates should even think of trying to influence which
community members will be on the Committee. How will the community make
such a movement wide decision? That is a problem to be solved by the
ratified Movement Charter, which we are about to create.
Lacking such a defined process to select community members to the
committee, there are IMHO two options (which have been discussed many
times):
1 Hold elections
2 Appointments
And I do assume both options to be based on self-nomination.
The objection to 1 is mainly that it takes too much time. This whole
discussion is going around in circles for six months, which would have been
sufficient time for two rounds of elections. To resolve this objection,
people who dislike elections propose appointments. Who will appoint? Only
recently Pharos proposed the community sourced board members to act as
electoral college for the community members of the committee. That is, the
people who are going to be elected in the upcoming elections. That will
necessarily take more time than starting an elections for the community
members to the Committee right now. However, elections are only necessary
if there is anything to choose for the voters, that is (many) more
candidates than room in the committee. Another option is to delegate the
screening of candidates, and selecting to for example to the members of the
Roles and Responsibilities Working Group, or the Election Committee as
someone proposed in the Telegram channel. What I would like to see is how
the committee matches the diversity matrix and expertise matrix as
presented in the Global Conversations on June 12 and 13.
On the weekend of June 26 and 27 there will be another round of Global
(and local) Conversations about how to form a committee. A third option is
that anyone who would like to be on the committee as community member (and
not selected by the affiliates nor the WMF) express their interest
publicly, either by replying to this mail, or on meta before June 26, so
all present at the Global Conversations in the weekend of June 26 and 27
can screen candidates and raise objections if necessary to the size, or
composition of the committee, or raising doubts against individual
candidates, or make proposals towards their preferred composition of
community members on the committee, or maybe nominate themselves to remedy
a problem they see.
In case we can't reach consensus or consent in the weekend of June 26 and
27 who of the community will be on the committee, maybe because there are
too many people who have expressed their interest, than a resolution could
be to hold elections, starting with a call for candidates through a central
banner.
In case you don't want to express your interest - assuming you don't want
to be on the committee and you do want to participate in the Global
Conversations on June 26 and 27, please start participating in the
discussion now, by replying to this mail, state your intent for
participating in the Global Conversation, and what you do want to achieve,
or accomplish in this process. If you do participate to block the creation
of a Movement Charter, please state your objections against a Movement
Charter. If you do participate to block the creation of a Global Council,
please state your objections against a Global Council. If you do
participate out of fear this process will intrude the autonomy of local
community of the content project wikis, please state so, and come up with
ways to resolve this issue, or, what should in your opinion be explicitly
in the Movement Charter to reduce this fear.
The stakes are high, and there are multiple competing interest in the
movement, while we all do serve the same mission. Given this complexity I
do expect robust (but amical) debate within the committee, and I will not
exclude harsh criticism - or outright rejection - from multiple community
members to whatever text the committee produces as their first draft. To
deal with this, we need a committee consisting of members willing to deal
with this complexity, and willing to process, and digest any feedback given
by the community, with an eye on resolving objections raised.
Regards,
Ad Huikeshoven
About me: Economist - graduated in 1992 from University Maastricht, civil
servant, certified Professional Scrum Product Owner (PSP I), certified
Prince2 Foundation projectmanagement, experience in Theory U and hosting
u.lab, trained facilitator, trained in Art of Hosting, Wikipedian since
2005, former Audit Committee member, former board member of Wikimedia
Nederland, presenter of Virtual Friendly Space Policy at Wikimania Hong
Kong 2013, former election facilitator of the 2019 Affiliate Selected Board
Seats process (I drafted the initial version of the Resolution 2019,
amending the previous Resolution), facilitator of the discussion tools
consultation 2019 at the Dutch Wikipedia, member of UCoC enforcement
drafting committee of Wikimedia Nederland, father of two kids - one in
university, one about to start. My native tongue is Dutch. Fortynine
languages have globally more native speakers than Dutch.
Also posted on meta:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_Charter/Movement_Charter_Drafting_…
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org…
To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org