As SJ and John have pointed out, there are many good reasons to wikify documents like this, not in the least to allow deep linking, and make reading more convenient on mediums that don't play nicely with PDF (like smartphones). So long as the wikified version is protected so as to maintain its integrity, I don't think there'll be any serious problems.
Cheers, Craig
On 14 July 2013 04:39, Steven Walling steven.walling@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, July 13, 2013, Tomasz W. Kozlowski wrote:
John Vandenberg wrote:
I have converted it to wiki text.
I wonder why it requires a volunteer to pick up a task that WMF employees should have done in the first place...
-- TomaszThe Annual Plan is not really meant to be freely editable. The people building the plan didn't just "forget" to make it in to a wiki page, they no doubt chose not to. If John or someone wants to convert it they're free to do so naturally, but it's unlikely it will be treated as a canonical version. As people edit it, it's going to lead to discrepancies with the original, which no doubt will confuse and annoy people looking for its contents.
______________________________**_________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l<
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l%3E,
mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe