It is interesting, although more on the larger issues of: * What constitutes a viable wikipedia language project? Do some languages not deserve to have a Wikipedia? Or, conversely, do we create a new wikipedia for every single conlang in existence? * When, if ever, can the foundation step in to "fix" a language project that may have gone astray? Is there a way to evaluate the progress and status of a language project to determine if it is generally "good" or "bad"? * What are the criteria for closing a project, moving a project to/from the incubator, etc? * What are people's general feelings about using an automatic translator bot to populate large numbers of pages?
These are all well worth discussion here and on meta.
--Andrew Whitworth.
On Dec 26, 2007 6:41 PM, Austin Hair adhair@gmail.com wrote:
This is an interesting discussion, but one that should take place on the appropriate meta page, not on foundation-l.
Austin
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l