On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Sam Johnston samj@samj.net wrote:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 10:43 PM, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
2009/2/3 Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com:
Hoi, The economics of it are such that there is a real fine balance between
cheap
and expensive. I positvely hate text on my posters. Printing on the back
is
two prints and that IS expensive. My point has been and still is that it
is
nice to come up with "solutions". They have to be practical in the real world. If a proposed solution adds enough overhead, the effect will be
that
it will not be accepted a solution.
Assuming posters are not for large scale public display sending the credits on a separate bit of paper would probably meets the requirements.
I'm not aware of any print-on-demand providers who facilitate the sending of arbitrary documentation with prints so my ability to reuse is still unnecessarily restricted.
Sam
Unfortunately I do not understand the interface of Wikiposters, but reading the translated English FAQ, I got the impression, that for instance if you order a poster of a GFDL image, they will print you the text of the GFDL as well. So I assumed Wikiposters is mindful of attribution requirements.
I guess, we would need someone, who has actually seen a Wikiposters poster, to tell us how they handle this -- and other licences -- in practice.
Bence Damokos
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l