On 27/12/2007, Matthew Britton <matthew.britton(a)btinternet.com> wrote:
Well it's not that bright a line, unless someone
comes up with a precise
mathematical definition of what constitutes a "valid community".
One guy running a bot to get what is effectively his vanity project
high in the rankings would count as "not", I'd suggest.
Anyway, while I personally don't think there is a
valid community, I
don't see that in itself as a good reason to close a project.
Indeed. There's nothing about the Volapuk case that should reflect on
other small projects. The problem here is problematic behaviour by one
person using it as a vanity wiki.
- d.