The reply suggests that advertising on a website disqualifies it from
being non-commercial use. One affect of that policy is that only people
who can afford to completely fund their site without advertising support
may reuse the content.
The argument that employing a share-alike license destroys commercial
viability is also dubious.
Hi Gerard,
I shouldn't have interjected the word 'therefore' as I think there are
other good reasons for autonomy as well, as I earlier surmised you do
too. But I'd be interested to know why you disagree on NC. I already
read Eric's arguments:
http://intelligentdesigns.net/Licenses/NC
as well as this reply:
http://cites.boisestate.edu/v6i3e.htm
and I'd be interested to know your view.
Thanks
luke