That is so true! Making book items is hard and then using them in reference statements is
harder
-----Original Message-----
From: "Andrea Zanni" <zanni.andrea84(a)gmail.com>
Sent: 26-1-2016 09:20
To: "Wikimedia Mailing List" <wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Profile of Magnus Manske
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 8:03 AM, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
- It is really laborious to add references. Many
references are a book a
publication and I give you one example of a book [1]. It takes MUCH more
time to add a source than it is to add a statement. The book, the
authors
they need sources in their own right..
Also, Wikidata has not found a way yet to work with books.
Yes, it's relatively easy to create an item for a recent book and populate
it with a few statements relatively to the main metadata (author, year of
publishing, publisher).
What we don't have is a way to *consistently* work with books (which have
often many translations and editions). We cannot import (yet) library
catalogs in wikidata[1]. We don't even have a consistent way to link
Wikidata to Wikisource (index pages, ns0 pages).
I think this is quite relevant for the reference issue.
Aubrey
[1] there is an ongoing project with the National Library of Florence, in
Italy. We now have a script to import records in WIkibase, and will do on a
local one. Then we will approach Wikidata.
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>