IANAL but I doubt it. Such norms, on whatever level tend to focus only on formal employment and access to services aimed at the general public. You're free to cast votes on politicians (and board members, for that matter) based on solely religious (or gender or whatever) grounds. I consider rfas rather analogous, with regards to individual cast votes. If the entire community turns strictly anti-Semitic or anti-LGBT or pro-White or whatever, or if a bureaucrat closes votes on such grounds, that's something else.
Michael
On 9/26/08, Joe Szilagyi szilagyi@gmail.com wrote:
This is probably a tempest in a teapot, but it seemed like an interesting question. On a local "request for adminship" on English Wikipedia, an editor has stated he will not support anyone who is not Christian for Adminship, and the RFA in question is getting very intense. Would people opposing actions or volunteer positions based on religion, creed, race, or sexuality of a user run afoul of any local United States discrimination laws, or local San Francisco, California ones, where the WMF is housed?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Inciden...
And the section immediately above it.
- Joe
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l