Delphine Ménard wrote:
On 2/2/06, Robert Scott Horning robert_horning@netzero.net wrote:
Now this is an interesting situation. Bureaucrats and admins are asked to "speak on behalf of the Foundation" in regards to enforcing policies on each of the seperate projects.
When? How? Where?
Delphine
~notafish
I just got through dealing with one group, the Hesperian Foundation, which was in the process of using Wikibooks to help with the collaborative effort of translating an English language medical textbook from English to Hatian Creole. See this page for more details:
http://www.researchonline.net/haiti/nodentist/index.htm
As an administrator at Wikibooks, I informed the project manager, John Rigdon, that he should try to do this on Wikisource instead. As it turns out, he is actually going to be creating the Hatian Creole language Wikisource project in order to get this translation project moving, and there is some additional Creole content that is likly to be contributed as well. As a relative newcomer to Wikimedia projects, he is still a little bewildered by all of the politics that are involved with all of the sister projects and just wants to have some space to try a wiki, and make some meaningful contributions as well.
I'm basically just holding his hand and get him through some of the rough spots, while politely informing him of the various project policies. This is a win-win situation for both his group and the Wikimedia Foundation, as we now are going to have a significant contribution to a language that has not been covered before, and his group is going to have a collaborative editing environment that would otherwise cost money that his non-profit group could not realistically afford for any substantial length of time.
I also use this as an example of a petty detail that board members should not be intimately involved with on a day to day basis but instead be dealt with by project-specific administrators. We are not creating new policy by any means, but merely enforcing existing policies and helping to explain the subtle differences between each project. Is this something that board members really want to micro-manage?