Sorry, but I really do not understand what you are talking about. Where
would that be ?
Ant
Milos Rancic wrote:
Ah, sorry :) Yes, "buy", not
"by"...
On 8/30/07, Mike R <tacodeposit(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Correcting spelling of "buy" in case anyone else was as confused as I was.
>
> On 8/30/07, Milos Rancic <millosh(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> So, let's test a little bit Google's tolerance ;) (my site is on
>> Google:
http://www.millosh.org/by_wikipedia.png)
>>
>> The point is that, as you see, inside of the add ons Google has
>> commercial "By Wikipedia". Even the most of problems related to
>> Google's financing Wikimedia are not on the Google's side, I think
>> that Google should give money for promoting non-Wikimedia sites for
>> money with the phrase "By Wikipedia".
>>
>> On 8/30/07, Gary Kirk <gary.kirk(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>> No Wikimedia project is currently ad-supported, Google or otherwise. I
>>> believe the stance is 'never say never', but I would think the
>>> introduction of ads would be extremely unlikely and similarly
>>> unpopular.
>>> Hope this helps.
>>>
>>> On 8/30/07, Milos Rancic <millosh(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I hope that a small image will pass the list.
>>>>
>>>> So, the question is: Does WMF have some money from such kind of Google
>>>> commercials?
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Gary Kirk
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> foundation-l mailing list
>>> foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>>
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> foundation-l mailing list
>> foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>