2011/7/18 Ray Saintonge<saintonge(a)telus.net>
On 07/09/11 2:06 PM, Andrea Zanni wrote:
My point (working in an academic digital library
and just seeing the
amount
of thesis, dissertation, articles passing by) is that if for people is a
difficult, overcomplicated burden to upload a PDF in an institutional
repository (5 minutes of their time, even less), how can we wikilibrarians
think that they will come to us and upload and "curate" their text? I
clearly remeber the "Screw it" feeling I had the day after I graduated,
meaning that I would not even touch my thesis again for the next months (and
so it was).
If 5 more minutes of an author's time is too much for uploading a thesis
that he has worked in for months or years that's his problem. He could
even pay someone to upload for him. It suggests he doesn't have much
faith in his own work. It's not our job to hold his hand.
I agree that 5
minutes are an acceptable time:
what I wanted to say (probably my English is worse than what I think :-)
is that "curation" of a thesis on Wikisource doesn't take 5 minutes, but
even 5 hours.
5 hours and a lot of knowledge in Wikisource policies, mediawiki, templates
and so on.
I perfectly know that having your own thesis in wikitext on Wikisource is a
good thing, but I don't honestly know if it is worth the labor.
Aubrey
I see that point. For the person who doesn't want to turn uploading his
thesis to Wikisource into a career in itself, the rules that he needs to
observe should be minimal. I still support the notion that it must have
been previously published in an accessible and verifiable form, which
need not be a Wikimedia project. For otherwise unpublished theses, the
degree granting institution is probably the only one in a position to
verify the official version. With theses that are first published in
electronic form we have only the uploader's word that it is a true
version. This is not even about dishonest uploaders, but about ones who
believe that the uploaded version contains improvements on the
original. Maybe the improvements really are that. but the ultimate
reader needs to know what improvements were in fact made.
Policy wonks tend to give policies too much importance. Templates are
often used to impose an unachievable perfection and uniformity on a
text. A minimum is still necessary, but anything beyond the essential
minimum must be justified by the person seeking to impose it in every
circumstance.
Ray