Ray Saintonge wrote:
Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
However my central point that a discussion of
something as important as
closing one of our most important projects in a way that few know about
it remains. The !vote is 42:102. We get more at en:WP on a RFA.
A further argument against having this principally discussed on Meta is
that those who are best served by Simple do not have the language skills
to participate fully in a discussion where there is unlimited use of
In light of that, I understand that there is some kind of simple
wikipedia usage among the OLPC (One Laptop per Child) distribution.
Perhaps someone could clarify, but if this is the case, then that would
make the likelihood that this already failing proposal would pass even