Hoi, My point is that we should not decide for ourself what a language is. We should leave that to others and to the standard body that is about this. That does not mean that we are not interested in the process. It does not mean that we should not be interested in how this issue can be approached, but it does mean that *we *should not be the judge of what is a language. Thanks. GerardM
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Crazy Lover <always_yours.forever@yahoo.com
wrote:
It is inevitable we have to use scientific tools, one of them is the Ausbausprache - Abstandsprache - Dachsprache criterion.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ausbausprache_-_Abstandsprache_-_Dachsprache
GerardM you critized the subjectivity of the clause "Sufficiently unique", Why do not add scientifical criteria in the community draft?
C.m.l.
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l