Erik Moeller wrote:
On 6/8/06, Jimmy Wales jwales@wikia.com wrote:
I will never allow you to use the Wikimedia Foundation name to raise money for a project with no written proposal, no budget, no professionalism, just "trust us, it's a cool idea".
I wrote specifications, a budget and a full proposal for Kennisnet in February.
We have never seen a detailed budget (though we asked).
This proposal named the developers, the roles and
responsibilities, and the duration of development.
We have not received a timeline (despite repeated requests)
The proposal, as
written in February, is at http://scireview.de/temp/instantcommons_2.odt
... I can not read .odt... (shame...)
I suddenly wonder if we got all the right documents... I suspect not...
Kennisnet was ready to approve the project as such if Wikimedia was happy with it.
... if Wikimedia was happy with it...
I believe SP has received the same document. Let me know
if that is not the case.
Errrr, can you make a pdf ?
Thanks
ant
Since then, the only major thing that has happened from my point of view is that I answered to some questions that came from SP (via Legal). For the most part, there was nothing in there that could not have been worked out as the project moves along -- see my response from April: http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/spcommittee-l/2006-April/000078.html
Erik