In a message dated 9/19/2010 9:38:37 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
peter.damian(a)btinternet.com writes:
"I would strongly urge you to leave the editing
of articles
concerning philosophy and/or philosophers to genuine experts. You simply
lack the understanding and expertise required to assess whether an edit is
a
genuine improvement or an obvious and cowardly sniper attack (as with the
insertion in question)."
Yes I now see the problem :)
Ivory tower eggheads who think they have the right now, to talk down to
other contributors instead of educating them.
If you, as an academic, cannot explain your edit/article/sentence to a
person who isn't already an expert in your field, then you simply are too
rarified to find a home here at Wikipedia and good riddance, in my opinion.
We don't need *more* huffing and puffing, put-out little boys fingering our
project.
Articles which can only be understood and thus edited by those with IQs
over 165 should probably be consigned to specialist (read read by few)
periodicals.
I'll take your one-sentence snipe as abject agreement :)
Will Johnson