Since candidates are supposed to begin answering on July 7th, I would like to nudge the conversation towards a poll of candidates and interested community members, on an actionable proposal to use the longer list of questions: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_elections/2021/Candidates/Poll:_selecting_community_questions

Maybe the Election Committee can help with this process?

Kind regards,
[[mw:User:Adamw]]

On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 11:48 AM Lorenzo <laurentius.wiki@gmail.com> wrote:
As a candidate, I am of course not the one who decides what questions
get asked, but I will share my opinion on some of your points:

On dom, 2021-07-04 at 12:50 +0100, Nosebagbear wrote:
> First and foremost, is that of the questions that received
> significant Community endorsement, only one was selected. That the
> Community felt so strongly those questions should be answered by any
> candidate should be grounds for presumptive inclusion.
>
> The question list is also short - not even a fifth of those
> presented. As a role that needs significant time, and in a process
> that lasts weeks, it seems dubious to indicate that 11 questions is
> the most that can be answered in an election for the most "senior"
> community-selected positions in the movement. This is especially in
> comparison to, say, en-wiki RfA candidates who answer well over 20,
> on average.

>From what I see, there are four questions that have received more than
two endorsements. One (about rebranding) has been included in the list,
one is basically a follow up to another question (commitment on not
taking paid positions), while the other two are:
 * How should the Foundation treat foundation-run projects that incur a
   high amount of on-wiki opposition?
 * Should there be a waiting period between the time a Board member
   leaves the Board, and they take on an employee, consultant, or other
   paid role with the Foundation? 

I imagine that these are the questions you are referring to. They seem
to me meaningful questions, that could fit in the official list.

Personally I have no objections to longer list of questions. I actually
expected it to be longer in the first place (say, 20 questions).
At the same time, I understand that the Election Committee wants to
have the same set of questions for everyone, and to keep the time
commitment under control. I wouldn't want my willingness to answer to
go against their efforts.

Lorenzo

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/H3R432R72SOR4ONUPFJWV6TVAA3POBX5/
To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org