I would say that his message was based somewhat on this e-mail from
earlier:
<https://lists.purdue.edu/pipermail/citizendium-l/2007-November/001156.html>.
So, he did seem to know something about the situation.
On Nov 20, 2007 8:39 PM, Robert Rohde <rarohde(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Nov 20, 2007 3:54 PM, David Gerard
<dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 20/11/2007, Andrew Gray
<shimgray(a)gmail.com> wrote:
(This is also why it gets annoying when people
start bickering about
things like Citizendium. We don't see eye to eye, we generally each
think the other's made a fairly big practical error, but fundamentally
we're *on the same side*, we're working towards the same goals...)
Assuming they actually do adopt a free content license, which they're
on the verge of not doing ...
David, do you actually know something about that situation, or are you just
frustrated by their lack of action?
Every now and again I will pass by and try to see if they have adopted a
free license (or otherwise made much progress), but to date they seem to be
largely spinning their wheels on issues like licensing. I can't help but
wonder what is going on behind the scenes.
-Robert Rohde
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
--
Casey Brown
Cbrown1023
---
Note: This e-mail address is used for mailing lists. Personal emails sent to
this address will probably get lost.