On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 11:05 PM, Erik Moeller <erik(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
2008/10/22 Bence Damokos <bdamokos(a)gmail.com>om>:
Dear All,Sorry for bringing up a possibly old
and closed issue, but
could
someone explain to me that why was the GFDL with
a possible migration to
CC-BY-SA 3.0 or later[1[ chosen as the site license for the Hungarian
(and
I guess some others as well, created at the same
time) Wikinews?
That must be a misunderstanding. All Wikinews editions should continue
to be set up with CC-BY, as per that project's licensing policy.
Could you please look at the footer of
hu.wikinews.org ; if it is a
misunderstanding, I would be really glad, but on the other hand all the
older contributions would have to be sorted out (I believe the hu.wikinews
started in the incubator, which if I recall correctly is under GFDL; than
once set up it went to this strange construction of GFDL+; and now it should
go back to CC-BY if what you say is right). Alternatively , if the newer
contributions could be under the CC-BY license (as the reusability of old
news and some parts of the interface or templates is not really a must; the
newer articles could be under the correct license without interfering with
the older ones).
Thanks,
Bence Damokos
--
Erik Möller
Deputy Director, Wikimedia Foundation
Support Free Knowledge:
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l