May I STRONGLY suggest that we include ALL the other depreciated image
tags as well?
Rationale:
Migrating from the current technical possibility not to include ANY
tag/description while uploading directly to the limited choice of tags
as per the below mockup link would be too big of a change for many
users, who will feel--wrong as they might be--that their images "have
to be included". This will lead to many folks picking "unknown/don't
know" (unbekannt/weiss nicht) -- and practically having no license tags
is ACUTELY worse than having depreciated license tags. We should have
MORE metadata, not less of it. Having "depreciated license"-images in
there (marked as depreciated) is A LOT better because we can always
deal with these pics and/or that entire category later and we'll at
least know where things are at as regards these pics. We WON'T know
that in case of "unknown/don't know" -- these would just be a wild heap
of wildly unknown stuff, making it acutely harder to deal with in the
future.
On 24 Sep 2004, at 22:34, Sj wrote:
<snip>
new upload form. The
important text for those pages
has been translated already; but that's the easy part compared to
actually implementing it.
http://www.ru-info.de/upload_neu.htm
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Translation_requests/New_upload_form
--Sj
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 10:17:22 +0630, Eric Pöhlsen
<eric(a)eric-poehlsen.de> wrote:
>> 2) fix stupid upload form