On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Aphaia <aphaia(a)gmail.com> wrote:
IIRC, Milos, you would love to have the proposed
Volunteer Council to
have the role of SuperHyperArbcom. Then I think I have a good reason
to oppose strongly your idea.
May you read my emails again and find where I said so? I proposed
forming of Meta ArbCom, as well as I mentioned that VC may act as a
*temporary* Meta ArbCom because we need some body to start to deal
with sediments of problems before it is too late.
I and Ray referred to the same person who was so
trusted as to be
promoted to sysop (and even b'crat) but once permanently blocked from
English Wikipedia Arbcom?
If some body/group/community makes some unreasonable decision (en.wp
ArbCom is not the first, not the last; jp.wp community decision for
your block is much more problematic because it was, AFAIK,
*community's* decision, not ArbCom's decision) -- there are ways for
working on making them more reasonable. However, without Meta ArbCom
and/or VC we don't have a regular method for that.
The other option is to give global power to local ArbComs. If one
ArbCom is not reasonable, other ArbComs will notice that...