On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:20 PM, Pete Forsyth <peteforsyth(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
Andreas, in response to your last message -- I'm
perfectly fine with the
examples you provided! I just happen to think they do a better job
supporting my position ("Commons is healthy and productive")
I'd have been more impressed if Commons had got there by itself, without
massive mailing list discussions carrying on for weeks.
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/commons-l/2012-March/006409.html
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/commons-l/2012-April/date.html
than they do yours ("Commons is broken"). I
understand you disagree, and
that's fine.
Don't put words in my mouth, Pete. "Commons is broken" is a Jimmy Wales
quote.
I do think Commons has some ways to go, though, on adult material. File
names that make no pretence at using educational wording are one such area.