Christiaan Briggs (christiaan(a)last-straw.net) [050225 00:35]:
David Gerard wrote:
>>How does one purge debate while at the same
announcing where it is in
>>the opening paragraph?
>Evidently he feels it is profoundly lacking in
prominence.
You didn't answer my question.
Er, yes I did. That's three times I have now. Please go back and read the
posts, I'm not going to rephrase it a fourth time.
>>Purge, in case you were unaware, means to
remove. The only thing that
>>has happened, on the advice of, Rowan Collins, is that it has been
>>_moved_ so as discussion about technical implications is not drowned
>>by Gerard's shrill.
>Are you assuming bad faith on Gerard's part?
You used the word purge. Please explain what has been
purged. I would
hate to think any of this discussion has been removed from Wikimedia.
From a very relevant page. You can hardly claim a
contentious move is not
being planned when you are actively planning it, and having
such a page
give the impression it is anything other than highly contentious is
(evidently) problematic in itself.
- d.