your arguments are just emotional rhetorics. Saying that "white, privileged
and well educated" people aren't allowed to critize ways how
first-world-led telecoms (like Orange, Telenor) are spreading a wrong,
non-open "internet" in developing countries is just plain emotional
rhetoric far away from any fact.
Wikipedia Zero is NOT bringing the free knowledge of the world to the
people, it's bringing Wikipedia to the people, not more, not less. Also,
zero-rating is helping to establish user habits which are used to have
different prices for different kinds of data - That is the clearest
violation of net neutrality and therefore of an open and free web.
Ignoring this is just helping the (first-world-led) Telecoms to establish
NOT a free internet which also helped to create something like Wikipedia,
but a walled garden system where you pay for different data of even (as it
is the case e.g. in some parts of India) different websites. I think that
it is ignorant to profit only short-term by bringing a Walled Wikipedia to
the people and having Wikipedia in this exclusive deal in comparison to
establish a sustainable way to bring free knowledge (which is far more than
Wikipedia) to the people.
There must be another way to work for the value of "free knowledge for the
people" but to destroy net neutrality and the experience of an open web in
the very beginning at the same time. It is the duty of WMF to take care
also of the framework which enabled Wikipedia in the start. Ignoring this
and being proud of having a comfortable deal with some Telecoms is plain
wrong and irresponsible - especially for a free and open digital
development of the Global South.
2015-03-31 9:05 GMT+02:00 Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com>om>:
With Wikipedia Zero people have access to knowledge that they would not
have otherwise. It is well established that having information readily
available is an important indicator for further development. Not having
Wikipedia available is absolutely a worse situation than having it.
Your argument is imho a bleeding heart stance. Would it not be better if..
My answer is sure HOWEVER given that the objective of Wikipedia is to share
in the sum of all knowledge, your argument is decidedly secondary. Sources
may be important but they are secondary to having the information available
in the first place. As long as we have sources in full blown Wikipedia, as
long as it is WMF that provides the Wikipedia Zero content... what is your
point. Yes, ideally we want people to ensure that people know about
sources. When sources are just statements of fact and they are in turn not
accessible because of cost. What is your point in practical terms?
Wikipedia Zero is very much a fulfillment of our aspirations. Do not forget
who you are: white, privileged and well educated. What you propose is
taking away something that you take for granted. Not nice.
On 30 March 2015 at 20:37, Andreas Kolbe <jayen466(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The recent Newsweek story on the Wifione / IIPM
admin corruption case
has clear implications for Wikipedia Zero.
Wikipedia Zero creates hundreds of millions of passive Wikipedia users
- Cannot see the sources of a Wikipedia article (I believe SMS users
even see which statements *are* sourced and to
- Cannot view alternative sources
- Cannot meaningfully edit Wikipedia (lacking access to new sources)
At the same time, Wikipedia Zero creates a monopoly position for
that makes the site an even greater target for
manipulation by local
elites, who *do* enjoy full read/write access to Wikipedia. Such
are fundamentally incompatible with the values
underlying the idea of a
free and open web. Monopolies ultimately result in *control* rather than
*freedom* of information.
The Wifione case illustrates that even in the English Wikipedia attempts
manipulation, focused on topics that the average
little interest in or knowledge about, can be
successful and remain
undetected for years. Small, regional-language Wikipedias are far more
unstable still, as the example of the Croatian Wikipedia demonstrated all
Wikipedia is far too vulnerable to become the gatekeeper for information
developing countries -- if such a gatekeeper were
even desirable (which
To give another example, I see that Wikipedia Zero is available in
Jimmy Wales recently asserted on Reddit that the Kazakh government "does
not control the Kazahk *[sic]* Wikipedia".
The Kazakh government, however, seems to disagree with Jimmy Wales.
The Kazakh Prime Minister's official website has stated since 2011 that
Kazakh Wikipedia project "is implemented
under the auspices of the
Government of Kazakhstan and with the support of Prime Minister Karim
Massimov", quoting the head of WikiBilim and 2011 Wikipedian of the Year,
who today holds the office of a Deputy Governor in the Kazakh
and is the Founding Director of a Brussels-based
think tank, the
Council on Foreign Affairs", which is widely
considered a PR front of the
Is aiding the market dominance and penetration of such a source through
Wikipedia Zero in line with movement values? Is the type of collaboration
described on Wikimedia's Outreach page for Kazakhstan? I don't think
I thought we were on the side of those fighting for freedom of speech,
the side of those suppressing it.
It's a concrete example of Wikipedia Zero aiding an oppressive government
in the control of information -- not at some point in the future, but
For a thoughtful examination of the issues surrounding Wikipedia Zero,
ask everyone to take 5 minutes of their time to
listen to the
Thomas Lohninger gave at the Chaos Communication
Congress in December
"Net Neutrality: Days of Future
Past?" Time code 37:00 onward.
I would be glad to see the Wikimedia Foundation rejoin the ranks of those
fighting for freedom of speech, and a free and open web for all.
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 12:15 AM, Jens Best <best.jens(a)gmail.com> wrote:
first of all, welcome Kourosh.
I'm looking forward to see how the reality of this exciting job
> gonna look like. For me this also sounds like a clear move to a more
> politically positioned understanding of this aspect of the growing
> importance of the Wikimedia-Movment globally. "Advancement Department"
> sounds pretty neutral, but certainly it isn't at all.
> When it comes to "collaboration with like-minded organizations"
> surely are also carried by a stronger public
postioning of the values
> the movement. Some of the decisions in the
past, especially when it
collaborations with commercial internet players maybe need to be
and transparently re-evaluated.
If Kourosh is settled in I would like to see a global, transparent and
discussion about our program "Wikipedia
Zero" which is under global
> by OpenWeb-NGOs and other worried members of the civil society in the
"Global South" and in Europe.
Wikipedia Zero which for me is a straight marketing element of some
telecoms to sell their mobile products in
developing markets and
> infusing an user-experience of data-specific payment habits, needs to
re-evaluated with a professional look that includes awareness of what
implications strategic partnerships can have on our core values.
The well-meant intentions which carried the Wikipedia Zero programme
WMF to the point where it is now maybe were a
little starry-eyed. Let's
> forget that a zero-rated Wikipedia which can't connect to the linked
> knowledge of the world is just a *Walled Wikipedia *and therefore a
> questionable contribution to our core belief of giving free knowledge
people - by the people.
The intensity with which the global fight about net neutrality is lead
because of the commercial interests of the telecoms surely doesn't stop
the markets of the Global South - therefore
Wikimedia movement has to
> perfectly clear which line is walked on this central matter of a free
> open internet.
> You see, Kourosh, the challenges are big and I'm looking forward to
experienced person overlooking the future
developments in this field.
best regards and a good start
2015-03-27 21:13 GMT+01:00 Lila Tretikov <lila(a)wikimedia.org>rg>:
> Dear Wikimedians,
> In order to encourage the expansion of knowledge, we’ve been
> > new ways to support and develop the work you do. Collaboration is an
> > essential part of the Wikimedia movement, and today, I’m excited to
> > know about a new addition at the Wikimedia Foundation that will
> > collaboration with like-minded organizations.
> > For some time now, we’ve planned to hire a Vice President of
> > Partnerships. Today, I am pleased to
announce that Kourosh Karimkhany
> > step into this role on March 30, 2015.
> > Kourosh will be responsible for crafting a strategy to grow long-term
> > for Wikimedia projects through building meaningful partnerships,
> > and relationships on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. He will
> > part of the C-level team and will
report to Lisa Gruwell. Kourosh
> > oversee Wikipedia Zero, which will transition to the partnerships
> The Wikimedia community has many fruitful and creative partnerships
> help support knowledge creation and sharing
around the world. The
> partnerships Kourosh will support will will help us better support
> partnerships and your work, as well as grow
strategic initiatives we
on at the
Kourosh was born in Iran and moved to the U.S. as a child with his
> Today, he is an experienced digital media professional with a passion
> sharing information with the world. He
started his career as a
> > journalist covering Silicon Valley for Bloomberg, Reuters and Wired.
switched to the business side of media when he joined Yahoo as senior
> producer of Yahoo News. Later, he led corporate development at Conde
spearheaded the acquisition of Wired.com
, Ars Technica and
> He also cofounded Food Republic in 2009, which was acquired in 2013.
> > an active angel investor and startup advisor.
> > In light of the expanded scope of the Fundraising team and the
partnerships team, we’re changing the team's name to better reflect
> mission. The new name is the Advancement
Department. To learn more
> > the new role, visit the FAQ here:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WMF_Partnerships_FAQ
> > Please join me in welcoming Kourosh as the newest member of the WMF
> > leadership team. We have many exciting projects in 2015 and I’m
> > forward to all the great things we will
accomplish as we work
> > support our mission.
> > ~~~~Lila
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> > Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe:
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: